Description - Why is this feature important to you - We are constantly moving projects around and have PM's cover for each other while on vacation and getting the proof set back to the correct owner and to have the PM that set up proof continue to receive notifications on something that they are no longer responsible for would be great. How would you like the feature to work - Allow the proof creator to be removed from a proof after ownership has been transfer Current Behaviour - Cannot remove a proof creator from a proof
Description - Please note: currently, we do not have Workfront Fusion nor do we have a DAM system that communicates with WF. Potentially a solution down the road, but not in the near future. If someone has found a workaround to this, PLEASE reach out so we can chat. I am very interested in learning how to solve this issue. As Workfront requests come in from Marketing Managers, I would like the ability to be able to tag projects to connect them to each other as sometimes they live in different campaigns, but edits requested for one piece would actually affect several pieces. Why is this feature important to you - This helps our marketing team to better organize related pieces without the hassle of spending extra time searching for all related materials and potentially missing any pieces that may not be used as often or are "hidden" in other areas. How would you like the feature to work - I'm honestly not quite sure... whether the traffic manager, project manager, or other user would apply a tag (likely on one of the custom forms) that would allow the ability to link that project other projects, campaigns, or even business areas. Current Behaviour - Excel spreadsheets... which often has errors, isn't updated on time, missing pieces, etc. An example of what this looks like for us: 1) Requested edits to an existing piece enters the queue 2) The "quick" edit is changing one paragraph and a photograph in a guide 3) The guide itself lives within the Product Business Area under (Guides), however, this specific guide has: -Three versions in different languages (Multicultural Marketing) -A co-branded version (Distribution Marketing > Co-Branded) -Cobrand on Demand Version (COD) Thoughts?
Currently a user can select their announcement settings from the Announcement page, which is fine. But my users would never think to go here or take the time to do it, and 99.9% of these are not relevant to my users. As an admin, I really wish these settings were options in the global email notifications area in Setup so I can set these! Would like to see these settings move from their current location to email notifications area from their profile (and from Setup for admins). In setup, I have announcement off for my users because they are not relevant, but I've wanted to use this features for my own WF-related announcements.
Our Daily API limit reached its limit and we were notified when this happened. It would be great to be notified when earlier. If we received an email when our Daily API Limit hit 75% of the total, then we could act before we reach the limit.
Currently we can create filters both inside of reports and as part of the initial query with our custom fields, but for whatever reason, we cannot select our rich text fields to use. I am trying to run a report where it filters for when these fields are left blank and cannot in the typical, easy way. I think this feature just makes sense as part of how we build in Workfront.
We wish that boards could push AND pull information. If we edit a board or information on a board, we want that information to push over to the project overview. And of course, vice versa (if we edit something on the project, we want that reflected on the board, as it works today). Being able to push information straight from boards to the projects would make boards and their connected cards so much more powerful. It would truly replace Trello for those teams who are still hung up on that visual. Until then, my hopes of getting my video editing team to drop Trello are useless 😞
We have a current team in the system that is an agile team. However, a couple team members on this agile team are also leading other areas within our system. We don't want the ENTIRE agile team to get notified everytime we add something to our backlog or a task, however at this point the only option is to edit every user's notifications and uncheck the box that says 'notify me when work is assigned to a team i'm on'. This works for those 'workers' who don't own projects, but not for the planners who are a part of that agile team but also recieve other requests in the system. It would be great to be able to control notifications for CERTAIN teams that person is a part of. This way we can eliminate notifications a user recieves for ONE team, but not the other team that they are a part of.
Description - We would like to request all user are able to drag and drop screenshot's / documents into updates /comments Why is this feature important to you - make the tool more user friendly for all users and also make is easier and quicker resulting in time saving for the users How would you like the feature to work - usual drag and drop as in most of the tools now in days Current Behaviour - for certain users the users needs to use the wizard instead of drag and drop
I would like to be able to pull in Workfront cards at the project object level into the "Intake column" on a Workfront Board. Currently, you can only pull cards into that column by the "task" or "issue" level.
Hello! I have realized that moving programs accidentally to the wrong folders can happen frequently...It would be great to have a window popping up asking for confirmation when those actions with the drag-and-drop function are performed. Thank you.
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Reporting Use-case: Generation of reports about pages that should include any metadata available Current/Experienced Behavior: No OTTB reporting tool is available aside from exporting via CSV through the AEM Sits UI which is done manually per node Improved/Expected Behavior: Reporting tool should have the following:- Configurable columns (any property related to a page can be selected)- Ability to export to CSV or Excel - Ability to filter which content should be included- Can save configured reports (reused)- Schedule generation/exporting of reports- Identify the destination of the reports - Must be efficient (does not harm the performance of the website) Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): AEMaCS Customer-name/Organization name: N/A Screenshot (if applicable): Code package (if applicable):
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Related case #E-000807920 Use-case: If you want to use Launch functionality to change a template of a page that has sub-pages are using the launch functionality, then the subpages are deleted when you have include sub-pages toggle on. Steps to reproduce: 1. Create Launch of a page having subpages2. Select the page and leave the "Include subpages" toggle on, then Next.3. Give a launch title and select the "using a new template to replace the page" option, then Next.4. Select different template and create the Launch5. Goto corresponding launch page and "Promote Launch" and continue with promote full launch.6. It shows the page's modified whereas all the subpages are deleted. More details can be found on the ticket #E-000807920 Current/Experienced Behavior: Sub pages are getting deleted Improved/Expected Behavior: a) don't have the switch "include subpages" in the launch dialog so that you avoid this effect. This means that you can change the template only for one page at once. b) if you have the option "include subpages", the main page and the sub pages are converted to a new template Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): Adobe Experience Manager (6.5.15.0) Customer-name/Organization name: Screenshot (if applicable): Code package (if applicable):
Description - Why is this feature important to you - We can't use the Custom offer attributes in determining the offer eligibility of an customer in segments. How would you like the feature to work - The platform should allow to consider inbound attributes in determining the offer eligibility apart from customer profile data. Moreover, the platform doesn't provide any flexibility to use any custom attributes from the inbound request. Current Behaviour -It can only support through events streaming but there are impact of that approach too as number of events on a profile will increase, also ;segment evaluation and offer presentation is not realtime and would need few minutes lag to return the appropriate offer.
Description - Ability to display labels instead of values from custom form fields. Why is this feature important to you - It would help with our reporting, How would you like the feature to work - when adding custom form fields to columns in reporting we want the ability to display the labels instead of the values. Current Behavior - Currently the only way to display this is to manually add conversion logic for each individual field, which just isn't feasible when we have dozens of fields.
Description: When setting up a Scheduled Project from within Workspace, the settings require an end date for the email reports. As an Analytics consumer, we want to set this end date to be 5-10 years in the future. Importance: In our use case, we have over 3,000 workspace reports set on a monthly send schedule. It is a huge lift to renew and extend these expiration dates every 11-12 months. How would you like the feature to work: The end date field would remain, but the future date would be extended. Current Behavior: When setting up a Scheduled Project, the settings require an end date for the email reports, and it is capped at one year.
I've been enjoying the new Intra-Linking feature in order to create a Table of Contents at the top of my (often very long) Workspaces. For example:What I'd love is a new Visualization that users can drag in from the left panel that is automatically filled with intra-links to all visualizations and auto-extracts the name of each visualization into the ToC. Even better, if we could uncheck any visualizations that don't need to be linked.
Description - When configuring an error handler in Fusion, I would like an option to have it RETRY the same module again. This is particularly true for Connection errors. Sometimes modules timeout in a search so I would like to have an error handler that just tries it again. I would like to be able to configure the number of times it will retry before it actually becomes an error. An alternate option would be to just have Fusion do this inherently. If the error type is a connection error, retry up to 3 times. That way I wouldn't even have to add the extra error handler modules. Why is this feature important to you - I'm frustrated with having to add multiple extra modules to my scenarios because the error handler won't just tell the module to try again. How would you like the feature to work - see above. Current Behavior - there is no retry option.
Description - Typeahead fields are essential for maintaining data relationships. Enable the current filtering functionality to also respect dynamic filters (like other parts of Workfront). Why is this feature important to you - Currently a typeahead field can only filter to a hard coded filter (ex: portfolioID=12345). The challenge with typeahead fields is that they can have tons of possible options - many of which may not be relevant to a given scenario. How would you like the feature to work - Enable dynamic filters (ex: portfolioID=DE:Custom Field) This would allow us to dynamically filter the results based on an attribute on the project - leading to cleaner data and easier experience for end users. Current Behavior - It returns erroneous results.
Would like the ability to change the view and add/remove columns in the Submitted Requests page.
Description - Copy Project does not copy cross-project predecessors as one would expect when copying predecessors. To not copy cross-project predecessors mean manually having to re-associate tasks. That means having to manually compare projects, use the inefficient task selection dialog for predecessors (project/task filtering by name isn't good enough to actually find specific projects or tasks), and confirm that everything in the project is set up properly. Why is this feature important to you - Copy Project is incomplete if it does not copy all attributes of the source project. How would you like the feature to work - Copy Project must provide a way to copy all attributes including cross-project predecessors if it's going to be a full copy. Current Behaviour - Copy Project ignores cross-project predecessors
Description - Prompts reflect classic experience when typing in a name. Why is this feature important to you - Lacks consistency of entire platform and reduces confidence in user base. How would you like the feature to work - Display email address and job role like Updates and Assignments area. Current Behavior - Please view below:
Description - The Fallout visualization is more than just a pretty visualization, it also is my favorite way to create (complex) Sequential Segments. Next to the Flow viz, it is the most beginner-friendly way into more powerful segmentation techniques. To make the visualization more powerful and the Segment creation easier, I prose to offer more options when editing a step: Besides Eventual Path and Next Event/Hit, there are many more useful restrictions I can think of: Session based: Within the same Session In the next Session In a next Session After/Within X Sessions Time based: In the same month/week/day/hour On the next month/week/day/hour After/Within X month/week/day/hour Dimension based: On the same dimension item (like page) On the next dimension item After/Within X dimension items Event based: After/Within X events Distinct dimension based: After/Within the nth distinct dimension items
Currently within fallout reports users have two criteria options for evaluating paths: "eventual path" or "next hit".Given that segmentation capability exists for within hits, pageviews, visits, minutes, hours, and additional time periods, it reasons that more options could be made available. This idea is to enable support for any of those criteria within the fallout report. A specific example from our site: We'd like to be able to evaluate the flow directly from 'page a' > 'page b' > 'page c'. Our 'page b' is a search results page and users can view it many times sequentially. As a result using the 'next hit' criteria, even with a page name eVar (with visit expiration) is very different than the results for 'then within 1 pageview', regardless of which setting for 'repeat instances' is selected at the project level. For a more generic use case, this would allow folks to do page level fallout pathing more accurately, given many users will have link hits that can exist between pages.
Description - The workfront task/ story/ epic Description needs text formatting capability (including table creation) & also should allow image insertion on the go Why is this feature important to you - Improves the readability of the content and also helps not to miss the key points that were highlighted/ formatted How would you like the feature to work - As like in text formatting screen Current Behaviour - No text formatting or Image insertion support provided
Description - making the threads in the updates more clear for user Why is this feature important to you - the users get confuse on to how they are answering or how to answer making this more that once the updates or responses to the are not correctly received and making the ticket not meet SLA How would you like the feature to work - make it clear to what thread you are answering or updating maybe using bubbles to surround the updates even colours to see different discussions Current Behaviour - no clear threats is just a black page
Already have an account? Login
No account yet? Create an account
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.
