Adobe Experience Platform

Hi All,For batch ingestion via Source Connector, we have been using field descriptors for hashed email and phone identities. We are now evaluating a move to identityMap approach.One thing we want to confirm before migrating — when a user's email or phone updates in a new batch, does AEP automatically remove the old identity node from the graph?Or does the old node persist and require manual cleanup? Curious if anyone has observed this behavior in production.

My question is:Does authenticatedState have any real-world impact when data is ingested via batch Source Connector?Or is it only meaningful for WebSDK / Mobile SDK scenarios where events are received in real time via Edge Network?

I have got the profile which has 30x profile attributes. It recently authenticated. Why the profile attributes are not propagated to EDGE? How to do that? I need to use them in AJO or AT and then these would be available on EDGE? 

I have several batch audiences which were activated to destinations within the past 2 years. They were created through the segment builder UI; there are about 300K+ qualified profiles. This week when I go to edit the audiences via the UI, under attributes there is an error which says “Cannot set properties of null (setting 'segmentJobData')”. Clicking Edit Audience results in an error of “Audience cannot be loaded. Cannot set properties of null (setting ‘segmentJobData’).”  Any thoughts on how to resolve this issue such that I can edit the audience?

Assume that I have a crazy use-case like that. Customer has one Customer IDs. However he might have multiple Loyalty IDs. I can set up these as array with multiple Loyalty IDs. Are there any edge-cases for such a use-case? 

Hi everyone,Our development team has been working on several enterprise web applications, and we've noticed that many clients are now asking for AI-powered capabilities within Adobe Experience Manager (AEM). These include:AI-powered content recommendations Automated content tagging Intelligent search Chatbots for customer support Personalized user experiencesOne challenge is balancing AI functionality with performance, security, and maintainability in large AEM implementations.At Tech Formation, we've been researching different AI integration approaches, but I'm interested in learning how other developers and architects are solving these challenges.Looking forward to hearing your experiences and learning from the community. Thanks!

Hi Community ,​@abhi_tiwa_19 , ​@DavidRoss91 , ​@bjoern__koth , ​@Devyendar , ​@RiteshGA ​@DineshK We have  multiple events are generated from the source, we plan to ingest only a specific event. To achieve this, we intend to use the Profile Access API to verify whether a particular transaction event already exists for a profile in AEP.If the transaction event is not present based on the Profile API response, the event will then be ingested into AEP via the HTTP Streaming Endpoint.Reference:https://experienceleague.adobe.com/en/docs/experience-platform/profile/api/entitieshttps://developer.adobe.com/experience-platform-apis/references/profile#operation/retrieveEntityAdditionally, are there any guardrails, soft limits, or hard limits associated with the usage of this API endpoint?Any suggestions would be appreciated Thank You Reshmika

we are trying to create a destination sdk to swoogo faccing issue which authentication type to use had tried OAuth 2 with Client Credentials Grant it is not working please suggest what kind of customerauthentication to be used for these destination .below for swoogo request api token for refernce :https://swoogo.readme.io/reference/post_oauth2-tokenSwoogo Api:https://swoogo.readme.io/reference/updatecontactthese was used in our config json it was not working: "customerAuthenticationConfigurations": [   {      "authType": "OAUTH2",      "grant": "OAUTH2_CLIENT_CREDENTIALS",      "accessTokenUrl": "https://api.swoogo.com/api/v1/oauth2/token",      "clientId": "XXXXX",      "clientSecret": "XXXXXXXXXXXXXX",      "options": {        "useBasicAuth": true      }    }    ],

 Hi Community,​@Asheesh_Pandey  ​@Ankit_Chaudhary ​@NicholeVargas I’m looking for some guidance on a streaming ingestion scenario in Adobe Experience Platform.We have a use case where multiple events are received for a single transaction from an upstream system via streaming ingestion, and the data is ingested into an Individual Profile–enabled dataset. The expectation is that the latest record should be reflected on the profile.However, the challenge is that multiple events for the same transaction:Arrive within milliseconds of each other Belong to the same streaming batch End up having the same ingestion timestampBecause of this, AEP often retains only the first record, and the profile is not consistently updated with the latest event.To address this, we mapped the source system’s published date to the lastUpdatedDate field (OOTB External Source System field group). This approach works when there are up to two events, but in some cases, the source system sends more than four events f

Could somebody explain me what is “use guided events”?What is the specific use-case for that??

Is there any way to debug with Assurance why the VEC experience is not returned?

 I am looking for guidance on a personalization use case involving AEP Edge Audiences and Adobe Target, specifically around extending personalization beyond the current session and supporting a TTL-based return visit scenario.Current Architecture* Adobe Web SDK* Adobe Experience Platform (AEP)* Adobe Target* Edge Segmentation enabled in the Datastream* ECID as the identity* Same domain journey User Journey1. User lands on Homepage (`abc.com`).2. Homepage contains a "Get Started" banner/blade.3. User clicks the banner and navigates to a quiz page (`abc.com/quizpage.html`).4. User completes the quiz.5. Upon quiz completion, a custom event is sent via Web SDK.6. AEP audience qualifies based on quiz completion attributes.7. Business requirement is to hide the "Get Started" banner on the homepage for quiz-completed users. What We Successfully AchievedPOC – Same Page PersonalizationWe created an AEP audience using quiz completion attributes that only become available when the quiz completion

Hi Community,I have to replace complete array with new values of array on every batch ingestion, but on every batch ingestion new items gets appended to this array in target dataset instead of replace. I have used upsert_array_replace in a calculated field and my dataset is profile and upsert enabled. Below is the structure of my target and source array, it has a primary identifier as "key" and "comm_details" array object to  replace. Calculate Field : upsert_array_replace (_tenant.comm_details)    -- Source Dataset Field   :                                  _tenant.comm_detail[*]       -- TargetI have already gone through documentation. https://experienceleaguecommunities.adobe.com/t5/adobe-experience-platform/overwriting-the-array-object/m-p/566290https://experienceleague.adobe.com/sv/docs/experience-platform/data-prep/functions#arraysCould

Greeting Adobe Community! I am observing the following error code  UPINGT-030024-424 An error occurred while processing the batch. Please contact support.  and here are the details of the error - “The XID cannot be generated for code userId.XID generation failed for nsCode = {code}, nsId = {id}” I am getting similar error messages in the AJO Push Profile Dataset while testing push notifications for different fields where all ingestions are failing due as XID cannot be generated. Has anyone faced the same? Any guidance and support would be really appreciated.  Thanks,Sambit

I’ve been trying out the Adobe Reactor API and was wondering if others have had the same experience with the revision media-type parameter in the accept header. It might be me, just misunderstand its functionality. The documentation states: All GET requests to the Reactor API require an Accept header to determine what data is returned by the system. In most cases, this value will be application/vnd.api+json;revision=# (where # is the revision number of the resource you want to retrieve, e.g. 1).However, when I make a request for a single rule (https://reactor.adobe.io/rules/{RULE_ID}) that have multiple revisions, and I use the header Accept: application/vnd.api+json;revision=6. I get a 406 not acceptable.The only value that seems to work is revision=1.  So my question is: is the revision parameter actually functional, or am I misunderstanding something?Another question I have, is about the format of the Accept header. It seems standard to allow optional whitespace between the media ty

Computed Hours in AEP License usage is always same from May 27, may I know what's the reason  

The method appendVisitorInfoForURL returns in some situations a “|” character. When these urls are processed by some of our systems this character is causing problems.adobe_mc=TS=1781184368|MCMID=30298187359278372896471907409936339487|MCORGID=A174401053C92A7E0A490D4CWould it be possible to encoide this url without causing other side effects or losing the user journey?

Facing issue in sending qualified audiences  to facebook custom audience from adobe experience platform. I am getting is error as 404 , have done with all the prerequisites facebook connection mentioned in document. Still it’s not working."Permissions error","code":"400 BAD_REQUEST".Appreciate any help on this.

Subject: Guidance Required – upsert_array_replace Support for Batch IngestionHi everyone,Good evening.I need some guidance regarding the behavior of upsert_array_replace with Batch Ingestion in Adobe Experience Platform.I am trying to update an array field in an existing Profile using Batch Ingestion (Upsert). However, instead of replacing the existing array values, the new values are getting appended.I have gone through the available Adobe documentation and tested different approaches, but I couldn't find any confirmation on whether upsert_array_replace is supported for Batch Ingestion.From the documentation, I could confirm that upsert_array_replace is supported for Streaming Ingestion, but I couldn't find any mention of Batch Ingestion.Could someone please help clarify:Is upsert_array_replace supported for Batch Ingestion?If not, is there any alternative approach to completely replace array/object-array values during Batch Upsert?Is there any official Adobe documentation that explic

If you're using Adobe Client Data Layer (ACDL) in Tags (Launch) and ordering of Rules is important to your setup, then setup your ACDL Events to listen to "All Events" only. Preface / Legend For the rest of this post, I'm going to use specific upper- and lowercase spellings to distinguish various items. Uppercase "Event", "Condition", "Action": these refer to the Events, Conditions and Actions in Tags that come from extensions. For example, the ACDL extension has an Event called "Data Pushed". Uppercase "Rule": this refers to Rules that are setup in Tags. A Rule can contain 1 or more Events (where each Event doesn't have to come from the same extension), 1 or more Conditions, and 1 or more Actions. Lowercase "event": any other event that occurs during your web page's runtime, i.e. when it is loaded and interacted with in the user's browser. "ACDL event": an event that got pushed into ACDL / adobeDataLayer. Background Tags, or Launch as is more commonly known, has a fantasti

Hi all,struggling a little bit to set up the Visitor ID sync between parent frame and iFrames by configuring whitelistParentDomain and whitelistIframeDomains. Background: we have two domains, domainA.com and domainB.com .both domains run their own Launch property both use the same AdobeOrgID both track into the same Adobe Analytics Report Suite third-party (demdex) cookies are disabledNow, we want to make sure the ECID is synched across outer frame and iframe for a stitched view on the visitor.Outer Launch property Experience Cloud ID Service config: (whitelistParentDomain is added, so it should be able iframes from the same domain, open for discussion if needed)Outer Launch property Experience Cloud ID Service config Data Element “whitelistIframeDomains”:return [ "www.domainB.com"]; iFrame Launch property Experience Cloud ID Service config: (note that the consent is disabled by default / for testing, but don’t work with consent enabled for both, either)iFrame Launch property Experi

Hi ​@Asheesh_Pandey , ​@jachlt , ​@Parvesh_Parmar , ​@SantoshRa5 I’m looking for guidance on how to backtrack and analyze excluded identities during exports in  AEP. Currently, we don’t have any mandatory fields or consent labels configured, so I’m unsure what might be causing these exclusions.Are there other factors or checks we should be considering that could lead to identities being excluded? Additionally, how can we effectively trace back and understand why certain identities are not included in the export?Any insights or suggestions would be greatly appreciatedhttps://experienceleague.adobe.com/en/docs/experience-platform/dataflows/ui/monitor-destinations#dataflow-runs-for-batch-destinationsThak​​​

Hi Everyone, I’m new to Web SDK implementation, and I’ve noticed that an upgrade is available for the web sdk extension. If we proceed with the upgrade, will it have any impact on the existing rules and data elements?Also, could you confirm whether the extension needs to be upgraded separately in each environment, or if upgrading it in a lower environment makes it available in the library for validation across environments?I’ve gone through the release notes, but wanted to double-check—are there any potential risks or issues we should be aware of during or after the upgrade?