Topics help categorize Community content and increase your ability to discover relevant content.
Views
Replies
Total Likes
Views
Replies
Total Likes
Views
Replies
Total Likes
Views
Replies
Total Likes
Views
Replies
Total Likes
Hi Frank, I have done this both ways as indicated in the other's responses. But if I understand correctly, you have a separate form that you attach to the original issue? You can make sure to create a new section on the form above your calculations and only give Admin access as shown in the screenshot.
Elissa Lazor Digital Transformation Consultant and Solutions Architect Austin, TX 281.772.3973
Views
Replies
Total Likes
Views
Replies
Total Likes
Views
Replies
Total Likes
Hi everyone!
I am a bit late to this party, but this thread is describing exactly what we are also looking for at my organization, and I have a few questions for you all...
We are using a request queue based process, so, much like you were at the outset of this (I imagine), we are looking at two options: A) changing process to work Business Case/Scorecards into the sponsor's stage of the request, or B) using custom forms as you all have described. Have any of you noticed any limitations compared to what Scorecards offer, or unforeseen difficulties/blindspots in your data?
I had a bit of trouble implementing the above calculated field snippets, but I'm going to swing through the LEAP link Tim so graciously shared before I get too much further into that :)
Thanks!
Hey Mike,
Did you attend the 2019 Leap conference? If so, then you can access the link. If not, then you won't be able to get into (FYI). That being said, I'm also happy to discuss with you what I've learned when developing the scorecard.
The main goal that I used out of the scorecard was to drive support team members to a discipline of evaluating a request against the needs of the organization, but also to create the visual that are publically accessible as to where a request lives. I would then use this information in this experiment (I used it for product mgmt as I was wearing project and product mgmt hats at the time) to show how critical is a critical request.
I frequently ran into a problem, as is human nature, that "my" request is the "most critical." And it could be, but when adding this objective system, it allowed for people to see their request on a bigger picture. We then can have discussions, which is the most important part of the score card to bring people together and to share a vision, you can then say which is more or of lower importance for the moment. The scores can then be adjusted up or down to help with that.
Another engine that I haven't dived into that may relate to this is portfolio optimizer if you convert these to projects (one of my next items once I get to it). I convert the requests to projects as it offers additional report and financial capabilities over an issue object item and then bring details in from both objects over dashboards that I then use to manage product mgmt meetings.
The other thing that I did with scoring that I thought was a great visual and benefit of using the application to do the heavy lift for me was that with the custom fields, I could choose our company's strategic areas / goals to weight the request against that, along with adding other factors to differentiate the score enough. I used other scores about compliance to regulatory needs (specific to my healthcare space), severity of workaround and if one exists, priority chosen by the team member, and age of the request. This helped me to tie in the request further to the company vision so that it all rolled up.
There's a lot of flexibility here.
Thank you! This is very helpful -- I was able to get my calculated field up and running with a bit of tinkering and you wonderful folks in this thread :)
I am experiencing an unexpected result, however, and I'm not sure if I did something wrong (I'm still learning the ropes on Text Mode). The code attached in the screenshot is giving me a score of 50 when I select SMS, Blog or Social, even though I am attempting to have those equate to a 25... At first, it wasn't giving me a value for Email at all, but now that's working fine and it's the options in the 25 range that are incorrect... did I miss something?
Here is the text (not sure if posting on Community will mess with the code though):
IF(Channels="EMAIL",100,IF(Channels="OLM_BANNER","SITE_ASSETS",50,IF(Channels="SMS","SOCIAL","BLOG",25,0)))
Views
Replies
Total Likes
‚We implemented a custom form scorecard. When our requestors submit a request they are required to answer 7 questions that were identified by the management of the requesting teams. Each answer has points associated with them. Once the request is submitted there is a simple algorithm that adds the total score and divides the total by questions answered.
This has helped us greatly as we are an Agile team so when we look at the request backlog they are ranked highest score to lowest score. Depending on availability and our teams capacity we select the highest scored item that we can complete within a sprint (Iteration) and plan our iterations based upon the ranking with some adjustments based upon availability and capacity.
The scorecard has helped us to prioritize. The custom form is a simple calculation to capture the points from each answer and totally them at the end. We also have a calculation to add up or count the questions that have answers which become the denominator for the points to be used for ranking.
‚I am assuming that the Channels field is a multi-select field and would guess that if you picked more than one items then the results in the database would be each selection followed by a "," or ";". I recommend removing the quotes (") between each selection and represent the multiple selection like so IF(Channels = "SMS,SOCIAL,BLOG", 25, 0). I would first make the selections and if possible in a report pull the field and see how that is displayed in the report.
Thank you Frank -- the Channels field is a single-select dropdown field, so unfortunately it does not appear to have taken the change well (I did give it a shot, as the suggestion was sound!). When I made the change, the value it was displaying for the SMS, SOCIAL and BLOG selections was showing as 0 (I presume because the IF statement was demanding all of the above be selected, but I'm not certain).
Views
Replies
Total Likes
Hey Mike,
I found that for a drop down field, I had to create a specific calculation for each selection and then do display logic so that depending on what gets chosen, it'll only show the one item with the score after the custom form is saved from the selection by the requestor.
First calculated field - IF({Channels} = "SMS", 25, 0)
Second calculated field - IF ({Channels} = "SOCIAL", 25, 0)
Third calculated field - IF({Channels}="BLOG",25,0)
I'm sure that others are better than me at doing equations and there may be other approaches, but this was how I was able to get this stuff to work. See if that works to at least get you going and then you can do a v2 that has a better equation that you can work out in the background. :)
Oof! That sounds like it is going to be painful! We have probably 17 different channels, so I'll definitely need to be hiding these calculated fields away (I'm thinking maybe on a separate, hidden form altogether, if not a hidden division of the scorecard form) All the same, a painful solution is better than no solution -- I really appreciate your guidance, and I'm going to give it a try. Thank you!
Views
Replies
Total Likes
Definitely let us know how it goes once setup to see the user experience (both from request and from fulfillment of request end). If you find other calculations that simplifies (I know it has to exist), I'm happy to see it too so that I can clean up mine. :)
Views
Replies
Total Likes
Views
Likes
Replies
Views
Likes
Replies
Views
Likes
Replies