To try to test out a use case, I put in a simple project: task1 -> task2 -> task3 -> task 6, all are 3 days in duration. task4 -> task5 -> task6, all are 3 days in duration. Take the project to "current", recalculate the timeline. All tasks are "as soon as possible", "calculated assignment". Viewing the ghantt view, the critical path is task 1,2,3,6. For all tasks, planned=projected=estimated. Condition is "on target". For reference, the finish date is September 5th in this example.
If i take task 4 and assign it, but then commit to having it done September 3rd or later, and recalcuate timeline. then strange things happen... -the critical path switches to tasks 4,5,6 (rightfully so) -the projected dates are pushed out. -yet the project condition still shows "on target"
So in this case, although projected are farther out than planned, the project condition stays on target. Also to note, estimated = planned So, I guess that is not what I expected. I expected that the project condition would light up if the projected > planned. Maybe the best option is to track planned completion v. projected v. estimated, and then monitor the project condition for good measure? Mitchell Tatum Confluent Medical