Thank you so much for details!

Hello!We are continue to investigate our trial version in order to prepare an internal review. We successfully implemented few workflows but have some questions:1/ Is it correct that in order to put a stamp "Approved" for the dcument which has passed review process it is necessary to use Assembler t...

Hello!Thank you, our Adobe sales rep provided us with details.Regards,Kirill

Hello!Could you please help me to clarify licensing options to estimate project cost. My company is situated in RussiaWe are currently have license for LiveCycle 7.0 Forms for 100 users to cover reporting needs for one department. We would like- to implement workflows using Process management for an...

Hello!Thanks for quick answer! Very helpful!Regards,Kirill

Hello!We have good experience of Adobe LiveCycle Forms 7.0 since 2006. Now we would like upgrade to ES2 and extend with Readers Extensions, Process Management and Rights. We are now studying possibility to have prototype for one process and have some questions:1/ Roles management. According to our b...

Hello!Again thank you for supporting this discussion. I just would like to give some ideas for your marketing team :). I am working for Retail (20 000+ empl in Russia) company and we are using LiveCycle 7.0 (Forms and Readers Extentions modules) since 2005. We are really happy with solution but we n...

Hello!Thanx for answer. That's what I mean! Imagine you have a unified Solaris platform architecture and you want to implement LiveCycle solution. There is no sense to invest into SPARC platform for this application, but LiveCycle under Solaris  x86 is not supported. I think that price /performance ...

Hello!Actually, as I understand only RedHat and SUSE are supported on x86 from Unix world. Are there any plans to suport Solaris on x86 platform?  A lot of companies have Oracle/Solaris infrastructure, but it is not reasonable to invest into SPARC platform for LiveCycle apps.Regards,Kirill