Got it. see above the test profile qualifies in both audiences in green

 not sure if you are looking for above.  I tested 3 scenarios: use case 1:it tells me the order of path in the condition node is take precedence regardless of level of placement in the canvases use case2:it tells me the order of condition node does not matter is dependent on the placement level in t...

this test profile qualifies both paths for sure

but how it explains above testing? the path2 is higher placement than path1, it goes into path1 which is lower below path2

it seems like hard to control the profile go into the path what I would let it come through. example above: what I understood is the path 1 is always take precedence over path2 in the order of condition node. however, as long as I move path2 higher than path1 is then opposite. one profile is eligibl...

Ok, is there a way to turn off the deduplication as I would keep all overlapping profiles between the audiences within merged large audiences 

Thank you! but if profile resides in A and B which profile will come through. A or B as we use A or B naming to the custom action with different touchpoint. it must have the rule in audience definition or system randomly select one.

Hi Team, question that I create a large audience by concatenating several individual audiences. I have a few profiles overlapping to the multiple audiences. my question is does it happen on the Prioritization in the audience definition if I selected one audience above another. let's say there are A ...

thank you, but I am not able to see the conflict management under the property umbrella. where I could apply it to the journey

Hi There,  We have multiple journey chains for various touchpoints, based on the audience profiles we've defined. Each profile could qualify for multiple touchpoints across different journeys, or within the same journey. The scope of our marketing strategy is to ensure that each profile only receive...