I did not try with specific date as it's out of scope. I would compare two attributes that's the point. thank you.

Hi,I tried another way having the same results with even more estimated profiles up. It seems not right as long as with two date fields make the comparison. I totally lost the how the audience behaves now. please advise what's the reason you recommended in that way and next step.

In Adobe Journey Optimizer (AJO), I'm defining an audience using a rule where:registration_date <= expect_date - 3 months. The format of the registration_date is:2025-03-10T14:43:57Zand the format of the expect_date is:2025-06-03T00:00:00Z.This means that expect_date - 3 months evaluates to approxim...

Got it. see above the test profile qualifies in both audiences in green

 not sure if you are looking for above.  I tested 3 scenarios: use case 1:it tells me the order of path in the condition node is take precedence regardless of level of placement in the canvases use case2:it tells me the order of condition node does not matter is dependent on the placement level in t...

this test profile qualifies both paths for sure

but how it explains above testing? the path2 is higher placement than path1, it goes into path1 which is lower below path2

it seems like hard to control the profile go into the path what I would let it come through. example above: what I understood is the path 1 is always take precedence over path2 in the order of condition node. however, as long as I move path2 higher than path1 is then opposite. one profile is eligibl...

Ok, is there a way to turn off the deduplication as I would keep all overlapping profiles between the audiences within merged large audiences 

Thank you! but if profile resides in A and B which profile will come through. A or B as we use A or B naming to the custom action with different touchpoint. it must have the rule in audience definition or system randomly select one.