I agree; it's not elegant; beggars are not choosers.  I also don't think the 3rd module is required, it seems like overkill. I'll probably attempt to shrink it down further.  The way I see it, there's got to be a better way but for now, it will have to do. 

So it turns out that it was the approach, after all, and the iterator module. I don't think the Adobe rep can actually say that   but the solution presented does not even use an iterator but instead focuses on creating a repeater using the HTTP DATA module output only - not that far from what you su...

You can set up Snowflake for a 30-day trial, and I understand how you feel.  I'm submitting a ticket to Adobe because I'm leaning on the side of "this shouldn't be this hard or work this way."  I do appreciate your efforts and ideas!! If they provide a solution, I'll post it here.

IKR - that's what I said! LOL  Yea, I have never seen it pull the data like that before ... I'm starting to wonder if it's some kind of bug with OAuth2.0 Module ...or again just how I'm doing it. I had actually tried that some time ago .. but always ended up getting this ...   

Sure ...  

that's empty  

No go ... so I've tried iterating directly from the HTTPS Query since that's already doing parse ... the get ( ) function doesn't seem to work (unless if i'm doing it wrongly which I'm okay with because it' means that there's a way) ... I've also tried my method which involved converting it the {{3....

it's not solid blue because I hard coded the entry myself as {{3.Data.data}} ... but you have a point about it not eing solid, I'll try lower case in a bit and post here 

I must be doing something wrongly or that just doesn't work ... simple scenarioresults from snowflakeiterator on {{3.Data.data}} returns nada  I feel like I'm really missing something simple here 

Hmm no go.  Can't "iterate" on {{#.Data.data}} because it's not an arrayI have to use my created array .. when I try your idea Comes up empty ...The issue seems to be that the iterator is putting the values outside of "Value" .. i have actually never seen this behavior before ... here's what I mean ...