I love superstition. Because it always works. I posted a reply on this post and then I figured it out in Fusion. I read the rich text field, entered the text in to generate a data structure. Then, I iterated each block from the JSON, using a text aggregator to fish out the text, putting a new line...

Just curious...has anyone done this? I'm about to frisbee my computer out of the window. I'm hoping that someone can give an answer here so, as soon as you do, I'll figure it out. This is how everything works in my life lol. 

We all know that Proof is its own system and is not entirely integrated with Workfront. However, as part of that continued integration between WF and Proof, different Groups will want to use different decisions for their own workflows. This should be able to be set on the Group level, just like any...

I'm sure there is an easy way to do this but my brain is Kentucky Fried. (Plus I've got vacationitis.) I know I have to parse the JSON but unsure how to get all the lines from a custom field to parse. Ultimately, I'm trying to get the text from a field into an Issue's description.   Please tell me a...

Ideally, we want this OFF entirely for our instance, never to return, sent off to outer darkness where there is nothing but wailing and gnashing of teeth.   We want to share things with the higher-ups and we don't want this to get in the way of the reports we're developing for them.   I'm more than ...

And not only is it one we've never asked for...it's one that actively makes our jobs more difficult being evangelists for the platform.   And while we're at it, we also get the "We're working to make Adobe workfront better for you" survey. That needs to go too. WE want data to help our users, as we ...

  Seriously, can we please be rid of this thing? I've had complaints from users--one of whom from the LT here.    I complained about this in my prior life at Bristol Myers Squibb. At that time, I was told that this was integral. I don't know if this is true. All I know is that it annoys my users and...

Absolutely! The first taste was pretty great and useful. That said, there are many other pieces of data we could use within the Project Object. Even so, we really need this on the Issue Object as well. 

We *love* the new ability to customize project headers and looking forward to being able to mix in more fields. What we would *really love* is the ability to do this on the Issue level. We are heavy users of the Issue object and Fusion automations and being able to hide things (such as Status) would...

Description - This option is currently unavailable and we would like it to be available. Why is this feature important to you - We have Groups who want to prevent their users from entering time on Projects, some that do. We need to have that flexibility How would you like the feature to work - Make...