Yes, I am now getting this error on a connection that was previously working.

I have learned some things, but have not gotten a "final" solution yet. Feel free to send a DM if you want to discuss more.

I am working through connecting to an external provider to send documents back and forth automatically. Does anyone have experience with automating this through fusion? My questions are currently around authentication.

I receive a "proof failed" error on occasion. I am not positive that this can be controlled based off the notification setting "An error was found that needs my attention" but might be worth checking to see if that's enabled and testing it. 

Use the Create XML module before this and you will add the required parameters (you want to also strip the xml declaration from the advanced settings if you use this module).You can put directly in the XML body (I haven't tested this one specifically but should get you close) or can do a set variabl...

I have users who frequently use this feature and now that it is gone, it is requiring much more work to post the same update on multiple projects.

I am looking to use Fusion to send documents with a specific form over to the Workfront DAM automatically. I've started building it but have hit a few bumps and wondering if anyone is already successfully doing this?

Hi! You can do this with a Document report filtering on Current Version > External Integration Type and then choose Workfront DAM and Current Version > Entry Date to whichever timeframe you want. There is a Large Thumbnail column that if you use text mode and set the width it makes it slightly large...

It would be really helpful to be able to log task time from either a report or from the project screen. We need an easier way for workers to bulk log their time on a project basis.It is unrealistic in our case to expect users to log every minute on every task they complete one at a time by either us...

It would be really helpful to be able to archive guests contacts in proof who are no longer with the company but don't want to remove them from past proofs they have reviewed/commented on.