Expand my Community achievements bar.

Exp_-_VazgenBa
Exp_-_VazgenBa
Offline
Type
  • All
  • Questions
  • Discussions
  • Ideas
  • Blogs
Filter by user contributions
  • Hi Skye, I tried to keep it vague intentionally not to keep reference to the existing tools as the questions are more about how work gets assigned out and less about the solution we have in place today. I do see how "the view" could have been misleading though. I will add some information on t...

    Type

    Questions

    Views

    390

    Likes

    0

    Replies

    0
  • You need to be a Planner user to see the People > Planning tab, but if the Planner User view was shared via the URL, it can be accessed by Workers and Reviewers via that URL. Vazgen Babayan Product Manager Workfront

    Type

    Questions

    Views

    805

    Likes

    0

    Replies

    0
  • Hi Anthony, Have you raised this with support already? The hours should show for the case you mentioned so it should be good for them to go through the troubleshooting process. @Colleen Masters since 19.2 Resource Manager access is no longer needed for Resource Planner. Ability to access the tool is...

    Type

    Questions

    Views

    805

    Likes

    0

    Replies

    0
  • Hi everyone, My name's Vazgen and I'm a Senior Product Manager at Workfront, over the Resource Management enhancements. One of the key ideas we are exploring right now is the ability to manage assignments in bulk and we had questions we'd love to get community feedback on. You can find those in the ...

    Type

    Questions

    Views

    390

    Likes

    0

    Replies

    5
  • We will add references to the corresponding objects from BGHR object with the next public version of Workfront API. The changes are already available for api-unsupported You can modify the following call for your instance to get the updated metadata: https://vazgenbabayan.my.workfront.com/attask/api...

    Type

    Questions

    Views

    663

    Likes

    0

    Replies

    0
  • Hi everyone, The changes have been reverted and the label "Subject" has returned. We will return to solving the confusion problem in the scope of a general initiative of enhancing Workfront intake solution. Thank you for taking time and providing feedback on the change! Thanks, Vazgen Babayan Produc...

    Type

    Questions

    Views

    536

    Likes

    0

    Replies

    0
  • Hi everyone, Thanks again for all the feedback! The goal of the change was to reduce confusion yet it appears that we introduced more of it. Thanks for your active participation and monitoring the situation with the end users as well. We will revert the change next week and I will continue investiga...

    Type

    Questions

    Views

    1.1K

    Likes

    0

    Replies

    0
  • Thanks everyone for the feedback and letting me know the results of the change! The outcome we want to drive is to increase clarity for what the field means, not make it more confusing to people. I want to ask all thread participants to let me know how users respond to the change - do all have the s...

    Type

    Questions

    Views

    907

    Likes

    0

    Replies

    0
  • Fair points. We have decided to go with the Name also due to consistency with project creation dialogue: In any event, the survey and the thread discussion clearly showed that there won't be one predefined naming convention that will work for all cases. The change should be live in production now. P...

    Type

    Questions

    Views

    907

    Likes

    0

    Replies

    0
  • Hi everyone, Thanks for all the feedback and votes! As a result of this, we will rename the Subject field to Name for a short-term solution and will continue research for the long-term solution of defining your own naming convention using custom field information. Thanks again! Vazgen Babayan Produc...

    Type

    Questions

    Views

    1.2K

    Likes

    0

    Replies

    0
Top badges earned by Exp_-_VazgenBa
Customize the badges you want to showcase on your profile