https://one.workfront.com/s/document-item?bundleId=workfront-classic&topicId=Content%2FAgile%2FUse_Scrum_in_an_Agile_Team%2FBurndown%2Fiteration-completion-status-overview.htm https://one.workfront.com/s/document-item?bundleId=workfront-classic&topicId=Content%2FAgile%2FUse_Scrum_in_an_Agile_Team%2F...

Right!?! Well, if you cannot figure it out, there is no answer. 

I have talked to many of the experts and consultants on this but no one can seem to give me a straight answer on how the estimated completion date is calculated on a burndown chart. The help article says it is based on the "rate of points completed". I am not entirely sure what they mean by "rate". ...

Thanks Kevin.We too, have the PMs set as the owners. In our case the PM would never know who that third party recipient would be so that is why we allow the sharing. I guess they will just have to log in each time. boooo 

Hey Heather...It is interesting that your third party recipients do not have to use a password. I have attached out settings, but I believe they are the same. Do you leverage SSO for your proof users and do they all have licenses?As for the authentication email sent to the proof owner, I think that ...

Hello - We have our proofing process set as follows:Project Owner shares proof with Client. The Client then uses the "share this proof link with others" link from the received email notification to share with SMEs.. The third party recipient is then forced to log in and create a password for PHQ. Th...

Ahh yes... I like the trickery! There is really only a few of these that need updated every couple of weeks, so one by one is not too bad. But, if I ever have more than 10+, I will definitely use this approach for a bulk update. Thanks again!

Appreciate the suggestions Doug. I tried the second option with the $$NOW qualifier, but that failed as well. I finally found the root cause yesterday, and it was so simple. The calc was retaining the old selections b/c they were technically never cleared. There is some logic here that I failed to d...

Hey guys!Long time - no posting....I have a good one here dealing with calculated fields and a concatenated formula. The field is a simple concatenated formula to give us one answer from several different fields. Easy, right? What is happening is, the field is populating correctly if we only use it ...