Now that Workfront has delivered on exporting custom forms, make this action possible to call from the API. We want to perform this action as part of an automation, but cannot because it can only be performed directly in the web interface, one record at a time.

Not just documents - same for the USER object also, please!!

Hi Timothy, this suggestion falls in the general category of "data validation" which is enforcing any kind of rule on an input field. It is currently under consideration, but you can still vote to show your support for it:https://one.workfront.com/s/idea/0870z000000PSEhAAO/detail

For clarity, we want mailto: to be considered a valid protocol in the Hyperlink attribute of the Descriptive Text field type, not only http or ftp.This will allow us to make descriptive text fields that say something like "Email us with questions on this process." When a user clicks on the hyperlink...

Similar/earlier post of same request: https://one.workfront.com/s/idea/0870z000000XiSGAA0/detailAdding commentary with additional context in hopes this thread surfaces in future search results by other users; and will copy it on the other submission.We want the ability to tag keywords or metadata to...

Similar/earlier post of same request: https://one.workfront.com/s/idea/0870z000000PSQvAAO/detailAdding commentary with additional context in hopes this thread surfaces in future search results by other users; and will copy it on the other submission.I think "typehead" is a misnomer for what is neede...

We currently have multiple use cases for referencing issues in a Typeahead field; and users are even asking for more esoteric object references, including Documents. Typeahead will become more valuable as more object types are supported, with Issues at the top of that list.

I feel like this is an oversight. I don't understand why we're allowed to bulk delete topics and routing rules, but not topic groups. There doesn't seem to be an issue with allowing us to delete topic groups, since we can do that one by one, so why not allow us to bulk delete them? We have to update...

This seems like a popular request among Workfront customers. I understand that from Workfront's perspective, they don't want the product to limit user's ability to open projects, if their license allows it. By forcing a user to select a template, that could potentially discourage users from opening ...

Hoping that the Adobe acquisition means the Workfront product will get dark mode just as all Adobe applications do!