and for a PUT request the id of your object should be passed in the body.That's why you had [400] APIModel V20_0 does not support action %XXXXXXXXX%XX (TASK)in your case the ID is interpretated as an action name which doesn't exist. PUT /TASK/body{"ID":"xxxxx","predecessorExpression":"xfs"}

project:totalTaskCount will always be the number of tasks existing in your project.totalTaskCount is not something you set-up. It's counted dynamically. predecessor expression is <task number><dependency type> (no task name, or reference or ID)ex if task 2 needs to start when task 1 is finished, pre...

Maybe I'm misunderstanding something but to me it can be achieved like this First request > project:totalTaskCount = 0 thentask 1 Reviewtask 2 adjust, predecessorExpression: 1fstask 3 finalize, predecessorExpression: 2fs Second Request > project:totalTaskCount = 3 thentask 4 Reviewtask 5 adjust, pre...

Solved - deleteProofReviewer() is working knowing that reviewerID is the ID of a Reviewer object, not userID

Hi @TraKill  Assuming your task list is added to the existing task list of the project, get the totalTaskCount of your project before adding the 3 new tasks so that you get the task number required to set your predecessor expression....Make sense?  

Hi @EstebanTr  The "logics" are described in the categoryCascadeRules collection attached to your custom form.Check: attask/api/v19.0/CTGY/<yourFormID>?fields=categoryCascadeRules:*,categoryCascadeRules:categoryCascadeRuleMatches:*Not easy to implement but feasible : )

No working.Our workflows are not based on templates, there are automated, dynamically created.Can't find no way to edit reviewers of an automated workflow : / 

Hmm found this one: deleteTemplateStageRecipients()Will give it a try....

Hi All, I'd like to remove a reviewer from a proofing workflow through Fusion.ProofHQ API is exposing a deleteProofReviewer() method. It is described as a way to "Remove the reviewer from the proof. By design, the creator and owner of a proof cannot be removed"deleteProofReviewer() argument list onl...

I'm gessing your Layout Templates are assigned to group, teams or job roles? If so setting home team, home group or Job role should assign the proper layout template to your user. If you're managing layout template at user level, set the uiTemplateID property for this user. You can get uiTemplates I...