@yuhuisg, Is my thought process is right.

@yuhuisg, No because when I breakdown it with URL it contain the URLs which has evar16 and evar17, but In purchase rule evar 16 and evar 17 is not set, but here issue is most of prodview is coming maximum under unspecified. Is it possible? If I edit the purchase rule, do you think it will work?

Hi Team,All the orders data is coming under unspecified for eVar16 and eVar17. Both these eVars are not merchandising evars  , it have allocation of original value(first) and expires after the visit. Please find the reference image and let me know the cause for the same.  

I have implemented s.campaign implementation to track paid search campaign, in tracking code I am getting all the values. The same tracking code I want to show in paid search marketing channel. So, what processing rule I can create  for paid search for having tracking code value. 

@PratheepArunRajthen how to resolve the issue, but at one time only one condition will be satisfy. So if I have put like this then it should work.

@PratheepArunRaj Yes, thanks for the help.

I am creating two marketing channel i.e. Paid video and Display. In both channels I am using utm_source parameter. But both utm_source have different values. Please find the reference image: As we know marketing channel follows waterflow model, so suppose if above condition satisfied, it will not go...

@yuhuisgs.products = "";s.eVar14 = "";s.eVar17 = "";for(var i=0; i<window.shopti_data_layer.products.length; i++) {//s.linkTrackVars = "eVar14,eVar15,eVar16,eVar17";s.eVar14 = window.shopti_data_layer.products[i].product_id ;s.eVar17 = window.shopti_data_layer.products[i].product_sub_category;//s.eV...

@yuhuisg, it is not resetting basically, when user is adding multiple products in cart, then evar16 and evar17 is storing multiple categories in it. how we can avoid this?

@PratheepArunRaj I also have same problem, for my implementation also pageviews is greater than prodview. So, what is the recommended way to implement the same. Do you suggest to add s.t() call, if not then what can be possible reasons for the same.