Hi @Knowledgeseeker98 , To overwrite MID value while navigating from App to web can be implemented by following the links shared below.iosAndroid However to store the value to a session storage you might need to implement custom code for the same.

Hi @NitishJ You can try using "Visit Number" dimension while creating such segment, as per the example provided if you want to segment data for first 2 visits only, You can add condition in a segment at visitor level as "visit number" less than equal to 2, along with the other required conditions within your segment.

Hi @SCox , Report Builder is compatible with MS office 365 ProPlus, you might need to check with your IT team as it could be possible due to some firewall setting on the organization network, Add-In is not working as expected.

Hi @Tanya_Saburova, When breaking down Marketing Channel value "Organic" with Tracking and getting 20% traffic for CID parameter, CID values could be the persisting values for the tracking code, when the organic channel was identified tracking code CID value was persisting and were not actually set, to validate the same apply the "Campaign Click-throughs" metrics in the report.

Hi @oscara95388635, If I have correctly understand you meant tracking for webview of web pages is working fine implemented via Adobe Launch however for App tracking on iPad App, evar returns unspecified in reports.In case of App Tracking, evars cannot be configured directly in the server call, you would first need to setup a context data variable wherein you will be passing values for desired evar and then map that context data variables with an evar via Processing Rules.

Hi @srikoll , You need to make sure A4T is enabled on the report suite to have A4T panel appear in Analysis workspace.

Hi @pradeep_07, To replicate and troubleshoot on this issue further, we would recommend to kindly raise a client care ticket by sending an Email to clientcare@adobe.com with the below details. 1. Site URL2. Steps to replicate3. Launch/DTM property name.

Hi @beato2 , It might not be possible to retrieve revenue associated to a particular Product when multiple products are passed in the same product syntax, reason being revenue passed during the purchase of multiple products is the “Total Revenue” for each product generated during the checkout process. It would not be possible to segment out revenue associated individually at the product level.However the only way to analyze the revenue associated to a Product is by running Products report with R...

Hi @paulinaMB , If I have correctly understood, you are looking for an example about how a processing rule setup could contradict each other.This can happen if you have multiple processing rules setup to overwrite value of same variable.For example, Rule#1 is setting up an evar1 with a value, now there is another rule#5 setup which is again setting up a value in an evar1. In this case the latest rule will take the precedence, evar1 will have value which was set via rule#5.