Aha! That makes sense. I've reviewed the data with our session replay tool, and that appear to be the behaviour in most instances. Thank you for your help.

Marketing channel instances still shows up some entry pages that wouldn't have the tracking code. Also, I'm not using the tracking code dimension. I'm duplicating the value of the tracking code to an eVar with a different expiration and then using that for my segment.

I have a hit based segment based on an eVar that creates an audience based on a specific tracking codeI've overlaid the entry page to see which of the 5 different pages associated with the tracking code they're hittingI'm using the visits metric and looking at the last monthI'm also seeing a number ...

Hi everyone! When setting up an activity, if I specify a URL with a hash, will Target apply the activity to only page loads containing the hash, or will it apply it to the base URL ignoring the hash? For example, if I set up my activity URL as www.example.com/contact#sales, will it only apply modifi...

UPDATE: I received feedback from Adobe customer support that I shouldn't use any other dimension other than the marketing channel detail ones as, for instance, if I overlay an entry prop it will return every value seen by that visitor in the date range. Therefore, if my customer hit the site directl...

Definitely a visit segment.

Thanks for the response Brian. Yes, that makes sense to me a customer hitting the site, not being able to find something with internal search or navigation and then using Google to help out. I do that myself all the time. I've overlaid the entry prop for URL and it is delivering URLs that have the P...

Hi everyone, I've created a QA visit segment for customers that have a marketing channel of direct and then a PPC channel based on a query string value. The direct channel is for all customers who hit the site without a tracking code, referrer, and it's the first page of their visit (this is one of ...

Many thanks for the link. That is most helpful.

We're currently looking to rebuild our data layer so I was seeing if the ACDL could be an option. As we're at early stages, we could rename it accordingly and structure it as described in the documentation. I was just wondering how it would all work if there isn't a clear path to the data being push...