So I'd have to generate a copy of the report, one for each user who needed the automated send? The plan was to send this report to a number of team leads and have it focus on themselves and their team…

Request from Workfront Proof (PHQ) reviewers who make huge numbers of comments of proofs and need offline collaboration of a team to have an ability to download a PDF, mark it up, then upload/merge back into the proof (i.e., like Adobe's FDF system). PHQ: FDF Functionalityhttps://one.workfront.com/s...

Yeah, no funky conversion from minutes to hours or anything like that; they compared directly. The tricky bit was "actualWorkCompleted" which is in the API Explorer (which I forgot to check‚Ķ); that value isn't in the standard builder UI. Well, and the darned gremlins. 

No, not very standard at all.  The key fields you need are: actualWorkCompleted = hours logged by a specific assignee; this won't be in the UI so you have to use text modeworkRequired = hours required of a specific assignee We have numerous filters on this one, but the key one is: Assignment ¬ª As...

On the Stage settings on the Workflow template (or when creating the stage manually), look under Activate Stage and choose the appropriate option: You likely want "On a specific date & time"

This report is on a dashboard for each worker and lists any task they are assigned to. It shows their individual part of the assignment (blue columns), plus the task name and project name (not shown, confidential). Yes, most of our tasks are multi-assigned, but this report gives insight at the indiv...

Are you looking at something like the attached? This is an assignment report filtered by $$USER.ID. Additional fields to the left are task name, project name, and project number.

So the workaround I assume is to duplicate the report and hard-wire the filter so no prompt is needed? Can I assume $$USED.ID and $TODAY and things like that still work, as long as they are a filter and not a prompt?

Point taken @Samantha Isin‚ . Isn't there also a setting that allows for a fixed deadline and the stage moves-on regardless of approvals? I seem to recall setting our templates that way (na√Øvely) and having to turn it off because our approvers are always late too.

My memory is a little weak here, but I thought you could manually lock a specific stage on multi-stage routings? If you do that, it should move to the next stage and "skip" everyone else in the stage you locked.