I use "getNewRepeat" and then set a processing rule that fires an event when that variable = "new", and a different event when variable = "repeat". You can then create a custom metric, and display % repeat as a metric on all conversion reports.

When you try and copy a set of processing rules to other report suites, you are taken to a screen with a list (in our case, a giant list of over 400 suites) for which you can select the suites to copy to. The problem is... the list isn't sorted alphabetically. From what I can piece together, it appe...

Big thumbs up on this one. Take a look at the processing rule title duplications for just a sample of one of our suites... confusing!

I realize this hasn't gotten much upvote love, but this really unfortunate labeling situation continues to rear it's ugly head at our company. Would appreciate some attention to this...

I've got all my fingers and toes crossed that you guys will tackle this. Not having Bounce Rate available in ReportBuilder is a *serious* drag - makes reports that should take 10 minutes to generate into hours-long sessions, with lots of opportunity for data entry error.

Fully agreed. The list of report suites in the "copy processing rules" menu currently aren't even organized alphabetically... they appear to be arranged in chronological order by report suite creation date. We have 400+ report suites... using this functionality gets painful really fast.

This is a bit of naming convention disaster which is leading to some serious confusion internally. So, background - SC15 introduced the ability to look at "Page Views" on conversion reports. For eVars, however, "page views" is actually an event that fires on page load, and will attribute back to the...

When using the "welcome letter" option in the user management area in the Adobe Analytics admin interface, you have the option of sending users a welcome letter (or in many cases 'password reset' letters). The resulting email looks remarkably like spam, however, and is regularly ignored by those rec...

Fully agreed. It's been documented elsewhere here, but there are many situations in which the percentage is actually meaningless in the message the report is trying to convey, and only serves to confuse. Frankly, it's something that should have been fixed a couple years ago.

Definitely. This is driving me crazy, as I now have a single monthly report for which I need to run Excel Client, ReportBuilder, and now have to go into Site Catalyst to do manual data collection. I love the new metric, but we need another way to get at it...