Couple thoughts:there are integration tools with subscription plans that may be useful (ie subscribe for a few months until the migration is complete)Leverage Workfront KickstartsYou can extract JIRA data into CSV and then use kickstarts for import. Depending on your expectations, what you want to i...

Hi @PiotrBan I don't have access to AEM nor much experience with it so I can't give you a solid answer. But it sounds like the proofing from the AEM side side-steps Workfront.  If you want a proof visible in Workfront, you need to first make the link document into Workfront and initiate the proof th...

Well - if a request is the basis for a project, then in my mind it makes sense to keep them connected. Where do you see the project as "parent of the request"? If anything, the request would be the "parent" since it came first, no?  I'm asking because you're creating more work to get around the buil...

Rats - then you need to use Fusion and map the fields from object the the otherHow come the request is not being converted? 

create a separate project-level custom form containing only the required 95% of fieldsThis is the way. When you convert an issue, and use a template that has the 95% project form, only the project fields get populated. This even works when you manually convert an issue and add the 95% form.

https://experienceleague.adobe.com/en/docs/workfront

I'm not fully clear what you're asking so I'll guess: there's an asset in AEMyou want a user to see it in WF From my recent experience: The WF user can't see AEM objects unless they have a licenseUNLESS you create a proof, then a non-licensed user can see the proof/previewI'm not clear what you mean...

I've had pretty good experience overall. Yes, I don't often get a response as quickly as I'd like. And sometimes I get a green Tier 1 who doesn't seem to read the ticket but just pastes in the boilerplate "give more information, link" etc - especially when the question is "does XYZ work" I don't hav...

We've done this on a client implementation - programmatically (Fusion) locking the request. Doable but a bit tedious.Doug's comment is just configuration and gets my vote.

@skyehansen is right - your valueformat=partialAtDate is the problem: Your valueexpression is, by definition, a string (since LEFT is a string function).  Change it to valueformat=HTML and you'll see the left 5 chars.  That said - I second Skye's advise to use the CASE/DAYOFWEEK example from the doc...