Also, you can parse the date in Fusion and then set the field to that value. The WF modules just needs a date object it understands.

Hi @MuriloPe considering what @JyotiNa1 noticed there may be an issue. I can't replicate the behavior (ie I see the record with expected fields in the data store) If nothing else changed and suddely records are not being stored properly you should raise a ticket with support.

Is there any conditional styling on the cell (under advanced options in the report editor)? If not I'd raise a ticket with support so they can log in and review. 

Hi @ArtieBertie Not sure I understand. In Fusion you get the event that a new request was created. You then check the selected resource's availability and create an update on the request that tags the person who created the request. Using one of the approaches I mentioned you can also determine when...

Sorry to be so dense: How do you "put the numbers in the field on the report and then all the other data appears"?So you're report shows a custom field - but even though there is a value in it it comes up blank? And if you manually type in a value other custom fields that were showing blank display?...

Hi @BrittanyB8 that definitely sounds odd. What do you mean by this: " I manually add in the info, that line adds in all info, but then disappears" Have you checked whether the field is limited via sharing?

Hello @Eric_D_Miller  One option: Use the Workfront ProofApproval webhook Or use the WFProof Module   then to MOVE an object in WF is simple: MiscActions module -  in Proof to move it you can try the updateProof call and set the workspaceID (but I have not used this)

Hi @ArtieBertie this is probably better for your usecase: Do a search for "timeOff" for the user and today's date. If there are no results, the user is available. If there's ANY result - the user has the day blockedYou may need to test with partial (eg half-day) time off records. 

HI @ArtieBertie you can see if the MiscAction module might help: It has the action "getUsersAvailableTime"   

Yeah I had a feeling  Are you able to modify the approval paths to include a team so you don't have to keep adding userIDs to the report?