Hi @kchaurasiya , Thanks for your suggestion. I am wondering if the difference between 6.4 and 6.5 would make the migration only works on 6.4. I have been trying crx2oak at least 5 time with different options and parameters. It looks there is s small progress, but far from enough to make myself feel...

Hi All, I am trying to migrate the content from AEM6.0 (Oak 1.0.22) to AEM 6.5 (Oak 1.10.2). Here's what I did,install a fresh copy of AEM 6.5 (/apps/aem65/crx-quickstart/repository)get a copy of the current repository in version 6.0 (/apps/aem60/crx-quickstart/repository)Run the commandjava -Xmx409...

Hi Jorg,We are running into the same situation when migrating from aem60 to aem65. We store the aem60 content in a nfs mount point and that is used as a source repository, there are two directories underneath, "index" and "segmentstore".  My command is: sudo java -Xmx4096m -jar crx2oak-1.8.10-all-in...

Thank you very much! It's very helpful! So even if it's a fresh installation, one still has to copy the crx-quickstart directory from 6.0 to the new server in order for the content migration?

Hi all, I like to ask a question about an upgrade from 6.0 to 6.5. In short, is there a tool that can migrate the 6.0 content to 6.5 in a separate server, and expect minimal fix? I asked the same question before in a more elaborate fashion, https://experienceleaguecommunities.adobe.com/t5/adobe-expe...

Thanks for your advice. I actually did something silly, comment out a jsp file where it's referenced by another file.

Hi all,I have been building my AEM 6.0 dev site for years without any related issues as the following. I always run the build command as:mvn -Pinstall -Pinstall-publish clean installIt basically builds the package to the author and publisher the same time. It has been working since the morning but a...

@Asutosh_Jena_, Thanks! I see the dispatcher takes the publisher as the first priority. It is supposed to get the local contents first, but it turns otherwise.Here is the log, where n_t.html is the file directly created in the cache folder: [Thu Mar 18 10:17:36 2021] [D] [40151(140249987221472)] Fou...

The log tells something pretty much as expected. The dispatcher skips itself and goes directly to the publisher to request the file.I am showing the two different environments so you can see the difference.  Case 1, the problematic one:I shut down the publisher. I created a file "n_t.html" directly ...

Thanks for your help! Well, I created a file directly under the cache folder, and expect the dispatcher can serve it to the end users. Looks like it has nothing to do with permissions.