@asutosh_j3, Thanks! I see the dispatcher takes the publisher as the
first priority. It is supposed to get the local contents first, but it
turns otherwise.Here is the log, where n_t.html is the file directly
created in the cache folder: [Thu Mar 18 10:17:36 2021] [D]
[40151(140249987221472)] Found farm farm1 for my-dev.nyu.edu[Thu Mar 18
10:17:36 2021] [W] [40151(140249987221472)] Unable to connect to
12.34.56.78:443: Connection refused[Thu Mar 18 10:17:36 2021] [W]
[40151(140249987221472)] Una...
The log tells something pretty much as expected. The dispatcher skips
itself and goes directly to the publisher to request the file.I am
showing the two different environments so you can see the difference.
Case 1, the problematic one:I shut down the publisher. I created a file
"n_t.html" directly under the cache folder, here is the log:[Thu Mar 18
10:17:36 2021] [D] [40151(140249987221472)] Found farm farm1 for
my-dev.nyu.edu[Thu Mar 18 10:17:36 2021] [W] [40151(140249987221472)]
Unable to conn...
Thanks for your help! Well, I created a file directly under the cache
folder, and expect the dispatcher can serve it to the end users. Looks
like it has nothing to do with permissions.
Hi All, Recently we had VM migration from an old location to another
one. The migration cloned one branch of the whole architecture as the
following: author -> publisher -> dispatcher. Nothing changes except the
new clone has a new domain name. Now we found a problem, the dispatcher
doesn't cache. We can authorize contents from author, the contents will
be replicated all the way to the dispatcher, but the dispatcher always
skips itself and tries to get contents from the publisher. For instance,
...
Thanks for your advice, it's really helpful. I am actually doing mostly
as you are advising. It's impossible to copy and paste as I am looking
deeper into the two different versions.
Do we have to follow Adobe's Archtype13 structure, or just keep the old
if considering the easy way at the first step? Moving to new structure
invites a lot of challenges such as package names, dependencies. But I
am afraid keeping the old structure will not be compatible with 6.5.
Hi all, Wish everyone to stay well during this difficult time.We are
considering to upgrade from 6.0 with sp3 to 6.5. I read through this
article and it doesn't look like we need to run the repo conversion jar.
The most difficult thing is the code migration. The structure is very
different and it seems we need to rewrite a lot. For instance, the old
project has two directories, "bundle" and "content". There are 5 now,
which means that we have to handpick all the components, models, beans,
servle...
Hi All,We've been building AEM 6.0 bundles using the old archetype and
it looks like a lot of changes moving to AEM 6.4. I followed all the
instructions as described in this page: Creating an Adobe Experience
Manager 6.4 Project using Adobe Maven Archetype 13 Here's what I've
done:- I created a settings.xml file under my .m2- Upgraded my maven to
3.6.2, as I encountered a failed message complaining about my maven
3.2.5- Created a project using the Archetype 13, answered all the
prompts in the te...
It's installing the jar file, but not loading the updated one. I tried a
few times to upload it from the package manager and installed it on
different servers, all other servers are the same. I barely remember if
it was working without restarting the server, seems that it changed to
the current behavior a few months ago.
Hi All,I figured that my bundle is not executing new features after the
manual maven installation. So I tried a log trace code
as:log.trace("start my new features");Then I ran maven as:mvn -Pinstall
-Pinstall-publish clean installThe code basically installs the bundle on
both author and publisher instances. But when I looked at the log, the
line is not logged. I looked at the package installer and figured
everything is correct, service is running fine from /system/console. So
every time I have t...
Hi Shashi123,First of all, the property "datestamps" is not a jcr
property, but a customized one, we do not need to have a leading "jcr:"
in our case. "datestamps" is a string array holding all dates for the
same event. As in our example, there could be an event lasting for a few
months. This is a problem to construct a meaningful query because the
oldest date is always used when the order is in descending. By the way,
"desc" doesn't work in our case. We are running 6.0, Jackrabbit Oak
1.0.22.
Hi All, Has anyone dealt with timestamp ordering issue with multiple
timestamps?For instance, we have the following
query:/jcr:root/content/my-site//element(*,cq:PageContent)[@sling:resourceType='event-page'
and (@datestamps >= '2018-05-01')] order by @datestamps
descendingSupposed we have a few results returned and some of them have
multiple entries for datestampsevent1 [2018-08-01],event2 [2018-02-01,
2018-07-01, 2018-12-01] (repeating event)event3[2018-06-01]...the
results will be in the orde...
Hi All,We are considering upgrading AEM 6.0 to AEM 6.3. With quite
limited knowledge on this, can anyone suggest what would be the best
solution for us?The following is what we have now:AEM 6.0 with SP1, SP2
and SP3Java 8 (1.8.0_201-b09)CRX: Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.0.22Classis
UIFrontend: Extjs, JSP60 templates and customized components, all in
html and jspWhat we expect:AEM 6.3Content migration with minimal work,
such as without modifying templates and components code. Retain classic
UIRetain E...
Well, I think we figured we should implement the way as you are
suggesting. Thanks a lot for your help. In regards to your question, it
means that without the "On Received" checked, the cached version of the
asset is always there regardless of what you do on the Author, even if
you deactivate the asset and upload/activate a modified version of the
asset. But this won't happen to the HTML pages.
Thanks for your explanation. The serialization type of the agent is
"Dispatcher Flush". These are the settings for "Settings" and "Extended"
tabs. So your suggestion is that we should set this up in Author instead
of Publisher?Thanks again!
"Web" is the dispatcher. We do not have the setup as you laid out. We
have the following setups:Author: Agents on author: Author-to-publisher
Agents on publisher: No active agentsPublisher: Agents on author: No
active agents Agents on publisher: Publisher-to-dispatcherThe attached
image is the "Publisher-to-dispatcher" on the publisher. Yes, we don't
have any flush agent on either server.
Hi All,We are running AEM 6.0. We only set up Author-to-Pub and
Pub-to-Web agents, but there is no invalidate flush agent. The current
setups are not good for assets such as images and PDF's. The problem is
that whenever an asset is deactivated or modified, we cannot see the
asset having the correspondent action, either deleted or updated. I
figured that we are checking the "On Receive" option on the "Triggers"
tab, see attached. I like to have that option checked, but concern about
the subseque...
Is the process com.day.cq.wcm.workflow.process.ActivatePageProcess the
default process? I disabled the process, but the page activation is
still working.
Yes, looks like there isn't a perfect solution for this. But the
workflow one seems to be the closest one. Workflows don't solve
everything, just to reduce as many manual processes as possible. Thanks
for both your help!Kevin
We are trying to implement some new features on the "Activate Page"
function. Currently AEM has its own, but we like to add some validation
when users click on that button, both the admin listing page(such as
right click on a page) and the page detail with the sidekick. Web
editors sometimes activate a page without opening up the "Page
Property", whereby they should fill out some required fields. But they
can bypass it simply click on the "Activate Page" button. We like to
enforce them to fill o...
