Expand my Community achievements bar.

Dive in, experiment, and see how our AI Assistant Content Accelerator can transform your workflows with personalized, efficient content solutions through our newly designed playground experience.
SOLVED

Proofing the Text-Only version of an Email

Avatar

Level 1

Hello!

 

A potentially newbie question here - is there a way to send an email proof of the Text-Only version? The system seems to only allow proofs for the HTML version. I understand you can toggle images on/off for the HTML version in your email client, but many email clients will serve up the Text-Only version when you are sending in multipart, so would like to make sure the Text version is QA-ed as well.

 

Thanks in advance!

Kevin

1 Accepted Solution

Avatar

Correct answer by
Employee

Hi Kevin,

 

We can create a text version syncing from HTML version of our content or customize it by turning off the sync with HTML. More details below and for proofing, it is delivering the HTML versions of proofs only (unlike Adobe Campaign ) when tested in AJO.

 

However, you can test the same by clicking on render Email and select Text Only client on Litmus.

 

ramakatt_0-1663844401807.png

 

ramakatt_1-1663844467508.png

Create the text version of an email

https://experienceleague.adobe.com/docs/journey-optimizer/using/design/design-email/text-version-ema...

 

Thanks,

Rajesh

View solution in original post

1 Reply

Avatar

Correct answer by
Employee

Hi Kevin,

 

We can create a text version syncing from HTML version of our content or customize it by turning off the sync with HTML. More details below and for proofing, it is delivering the HTML versions of proofs only (unlike Adobe Campaign ) when tested in AJO.

 

However, you can test the same by clicking on render Email and select Text Only client on Litmus.

 

ramakatt_0-1663844401807.png

 

ramakatt_1-1663844467508.png

Create the text version of an email

https://experienceleague.adobe.com/docs/journey-optimizer/using/design/design-email/text-version-ema...

 

Thanks,

Rajesh