Several of my 8.2 processes are quite large (perhaps 200+ activities). Unfortunately, the requirements of the process means that I don't have a great deal of subprocess flexibility. They are getting painful to edit because:
I suspect this has a lot to do with the fact that the Workbench UI is in constant contact with the LC Server.
So ... my question is, does ES2, 9.0, 9.5 eliminate a lot of these issues by allowing you to work in the local sandbox where a constant updating of the LC Server is not required?
Solved! Go to Solution.
Views
Replies
Total Likes
One of the major internal changes of the Process Editor is to base its graphic manipulation on a Flash based authoring experiance. Additionally, the periodic background commuication with the server has been largely removed. Your experience editing large process maps with ES2 should be substaintially better than it was with the 8x product.
Views
Replies
Total Likes
The ES2 Workbench allows you to work on a local copy of the process that is then uploaded (deployed) to the server when you want to run it. There is still some communication with the server, but its much less chatty
One of the major internal changes of the Process Editor is to base its graphic manipulation on a Flash based authoring experiance. Additionally, the periodic background commuication with the server has been largely removed. Your experience editing large process maps with ES2 should be substaintially better than it was with the 8x product.
Views
Replies
Total Likes