is counter event and metric instances same?
Solved! Go to Solution.
Views
Replies
Total Likes
To add some additional context... are they the same thing... No
Can you use Instance of X in place of setting up a custom metric - in most cases Yes
While the blog post does help to explain the differences, many of the issues that used to exist when trying to use Instance no longer apply... Unlike the old Reports, "Instance of " counters are valid metrics that we can use...(and I use them all the time)
In my own implementation, I have a Custom Metric for "Menu Interactions", If I look at this data side by side with "Custom Link Instance" (filtered for items that contain "menu" as per my naming conventions) they are an exact match.
In many cases now, I am using the Instance metrics (for less important items - I still make proper named counters for key items) rather than custom metrics.
Now, that said, Instance Metrics can be tricky when dealing with s.products for instance.. since you could have multiple products, and you want each to count... but an instance of wouldn't count against each product, but as a whole... so using Instances here wouldn't be a good match.
So while it's good to be aware of the limitations that instance of used to have, we also need to be free to move forward and use data that is available to us out of the box...
I am going to answer you with one of my favorite posts by Adam Greco, but the simple answer is: NO.
https://blog.adobe.com/en/publish/2009/04/19/instances-inside-omniture-sitecatalyst#gs.2uwzac
To add some additional context... are they the same thing... No
Can you use Instance of X in place of setting up a custom metric - in most cases Yes
While the blog post does help to explain the differences, many of the issues that used to exist when trying to use Instance no longer apply... Unlike the old Reports, "Instance of " counters are valid metrics that we can use...(and I use them all the time)
In my own implementation, I have a Custom Metric for "Menu Interactions", If I look at this data side by side with "Custom Link Instance" (filtered for items that contain "menu" as per my naming conventions) they are an exact match.
In many cases now, I am using the Instance metrics (for less important items - I still make proper named counters for key items) rather than custom metrics.
Now, that said, Instance Metrics can be tricky when dealing with s.products for instance.. since you could have multiple products, and you want each to count... but an instance of wouldn't count against each product, but as a whole... so using Instances here wouldn't be a good match.
So while it's good to be aware of the limitations that instance of used to have, we also need to be free to move forward and use data that is available to us out of the box...
One more thing I should mention... on your eVars... Instance of is a bit different...
Let's say you are tracking a campaign, and you store it in eVar1 (with a visit level attribution). This will be tracked on the first page, then carried through on other pages through attribution.
When you build a report like this:
Page Views Instance of eVar1
eVar1 100 20
The "Instance Of" is the instance where the eVar was set (i.e. on the first page that actually contained the campaign), the page views represent all the pages (including the first one) that have the campaign value set (either directly or through attribution)
This distinction is important.. I use the Instance of to find people coming to the page via the campaign, then I use Page View / Instance to get a average pages viewed coming from the campaign.
Views
Replies
Total Likes
I guess when you say custom metric you refer to counter event and not event that stores currency or numbers?
Also I am planning to use instances for just simple click link name and based on your explanation I guess instances must be enough.
Views
Replies
Total Likes
Yes, since you yourself mentioned "Counter" events, I was focusing the conversation on those... of course, you are correct, there are other types of events, such as Numeric or Currency (where you can pass specific incremental values)
For anyone who comes across this post...
let's add a simple comparison of those events
On a call 1:
s.eVar1 = "something";
s.events = "event1,event2=5,event3=9.99";
On a call 2:
s.eVar1 = "something else";
s.events = "event1,event2=5,event3=9.99";
Instance of eVar1 | Event 1 | Event 2 | Event 3 | |
eVar1 | 2 | 2 | 10 | 19.98 |
something | 1 | 1 | 5 | 9.99 |
something else | 1 | 1 | 5 | 9.99 |
Please change s.eVar1 in call 2 as something else.
Oops.. copy and paste issue.. fixed
But why is the occurrences different here when the visits and pageviews are same in both prop and evar?
Views
Replies
Total Likes
Because occurrence also includes all actions/clicks (also your Pave Views are 1 off... 13 vs 14)
So let's say you have:
When an eVar is set to "Visit" level expiry; every single hit - page view s.t() and action s.tl() - will count the value as being set until the end of the Visit (or until a new value is set into your eVar)...
Only the page view calls s.t() will count against the Page View metric... both s.t() and s.tl() calls will count against the Occurrence metric.... the Instance of eVar1 metric will only count the instances where the eVar was explicitly set.
If you don't need the value of your eVar to be maintained on all subsequent hits, then you can change the expiry to "Hit" level so that it acts like a Prop... only setting the value where it is set.
@aagk123 - I will counter @Jennifer_Dungan's reply with just one point, and she does make a good argument with everything else. I will say that if you want an accurate count for ANYTHING, then a success event associated with your conversion variable is always the best way to implement things. However, if that is now how things were initially done, then Instances may be your fallback.
Since all my instances and custom events match 100%, I have no concerns at all with the accuracy of my instances...
LOL! The fact that I got such a detailed answer out of you is awesome. Instances just bother me so much, but I see why many people use them. I've just been burned enough that I tend to mistrust them.
Well back in the old Reports.. yeah.. Instances were a mess... I never used them until Workspace (after a lot of comparative tests... metric vs instance)
Views
Replies
Total Likes
Views
Likes
Replies
Views
Likes
Replies