Adobe Workfront

Of course, after everyone reviews, it is realized someone was forgotten and we can’t edit the workflows!!  Would love the ability to be able to.

I have been trouble shooting and researching with no luck. Hopefully one of you can help.  I’m trying to create advanced mode logic for a form with many involved fields. An easy example is:Custom form question “How many segments do you need?” with dropdown answers of 1,2,3,4,…I’m trying to add logic, so that if someone selects 4 segments, the form will show sections 1,2,3 and 4.I’ve tried many variations of the below. Now from what I’ve found it seems like maybe I can’t use OR statements in the advanced logic.IF({DE:How many segments do you need?}="1" OR {DE:How many segments do you need?}="2" OR {DE:How many segments do you need?}="3" OR {DE:How many segments do you need?}="4"Anyone?

When there are more than one users on a task and they have completed ‘done with my part’ it still shows up in the workload balancer that they have that task. Is there a way that that task shows complete on their workload balancer?

Hi, does anybody have the same issue, when adding new users to Workfront, they are supposed to receive an email to activate their account, but they don’t - I have verified with multiple new users. Is there something extra I need to set-up ?Only after adding the users and going to the Send Update to User - the user will receive a message.thanks,Bianca

Hi all! I’ve looked over a variety of threads for this, but come up blank.In a Project Report, this will successfully pull a link to the Project Details tab of any project listed:displayname=Project Detailsvalueexpression=CONCAT("https://experience.adobe.com/#/@COMPANY/so:COMPANY-Production/workfront/project/",{ID},"/overview")valueformat=HTML The issue is that I cannot seem to shorten this CONCAT link to hyperlinked text in the way I’d be able to with a default URL field or a custom field. Examples of each:System Field URL:displayname=URLlink.url=URLvalueexpression=IF(ISBLANK({URL}),"","🔗")valueformat=HTMLCustom Field URL:displayname=Dropboxlink.url=customDataLabelsAsString(Dropbox link)valueexpression=IF(ISBLANK({DE:Dropbox link}),"","🔗")valueformat=HTML I’ve tried a bunch of combos of all of the code above, but nothing is working. I’m not allowed to create custom fields, so I need a text mode only solution. ——— Hoping to carry the same solution over to a Document View as well, to

Workfront adoption isn’t a one-time launch, it’s a long-term strategy. Because Workfront changes how work actually flows (not just where it’s tracked), teams are often shifting processes, roles, and long-standing habits. In this practitioner-focused session, featuring Carol Thomas-Knipes, VP, Creative Technology Operations at Citi (@thatdamladynyc); Daniel Clarke, Director, Adobe Workfront and Fusion Practice at EMMsphere (@Daniel_Clarke ); and Victoria Sellers, Associate Manager at Accenture (@VicSellers) shared how to design Workfront so people want to use it—and keep using it.Specifically, you’ll hear:How to design your Workfront environment for adoption from day one, including governance, templates, and user experiences Tips for standardizing intake and workflow so work enters the system consistently, moves efficiently, and provides leaders with visibility without creating friction for teams Practical ways to use automation to drive engagement and accountability A clear, actionable

Hello!  We do gate approvals in Workfront.  Our approval flow is set up to send to Manager A and B, and if one of them approves the task, it’s approved.I have been asked if I can make a report that shows who approved each gate and when.  I have the date figured out, and I found a way to show both Manager A’s and Manager B’s names as “Approvers”, but I can’t figure out a way to pull which manager actually hit the approve button.Does anyone have any ideas?  Thank you!

I am not able to connect my gmail with fusion, I have followed all the steps mentioned in fusion documention and updated google console, then also it is throwing this error. Please help me get through this.  

Thank you to all of you for joining **L821 – Take-off with Fusion! Go from 0 to Integration in 90 Minutes** at Adobe Summit 2026. Below you'll find everything but the deck from the session.   To revisit the exercises at your own pace we’ve included the .json’s here that were used in the exercises and behind the scenes to populate the firefly generated images.  These can be imported into your Fusion environment by creating a new scenario-->going to the … menu at the bottom of the Scenario designer screen -->selecting import .json. Lab DocumentationFollow the full step-by-step walkthrough here:L821 Lab Workbook ## Questions?Drop them in the comments — the community and our team are happy to help. 

Hi,Does anybody knows how the Overdue email notification for task/issue can be turned off ? I went in Set-up - Email - Notifications - and turned off everything related to task/issue + also in the User Profile - but still receiving them.thanks,Bianca

Web Team’s ViewI have created a Processed Web Request report and am hitting a roadblock when sharing with two members of the Web Team. Their report is blank, they can see the Title of the Report Name, that is all.I have checked their access to reports and they are both set to Edit. I’m not certain why they cannot see the full data collected.  They are not system admins, they have a Standard License.  Thank you,Jenny

Hi everyone,How are you handling interactive proofing for Adobe Experience Manager Sites pages?I’m working on a use case where the client wants to use interactive proofs in Workfront Proof to review and approve pages that are still in preview. The challenge is that the preview environment is behind authentication, and interactive proofing doesn’t support authenticated access.Have you found any viable workarounds or alternative approaches in this scenario?I’m aware of fallback options like manually capturing screenshots or screen recordings, but ideally we’d like to retain the benefits of interactive proofing.Also curious if tools like Frame.io offer a better solution for this kind of workflow, or if there are other patterns you’d recommend. Thanks!

Description - Would like to have a description area to be able to apply information about how a calendar to provide information regarding a calendarWhy is this feature important to you - This would be a place where information can be provided on how to use the intended calendar, simple instructions about the different views and to provide some information for admin governance needs.How would you like the feature to work - Add description area that can be seen at the top of the calendar or can be added to the left navigation panel.Current Behavior: This does not exist.

Does the Workfront Planning connection only support the objects listed below? not Tasks and Issues?  

I’m just wondering where your teams are getting the best value out of the AI assistant in Workfront. I’m not getting much feedback so far from our user base - I’d love to hear where it’s showing time efficiencies for your users

Requirements - Security requirement to have logs from Workfront and Fusion to be sent back to NAB (user, sys logs – no PII data). Simple Explanation of the Workfront & Fusion Logging RequirementNAB needs to make sure that anything happening inside Workfront and Workfront Fusion can be tracked for security and audit purposes.To do this, logs from both systems must be sent back into NAB’s internal monitoring tools.What kind of logs?User activity logs – e.g., who logged in, who made changes, what actions were taken System logs – e.g., system events, automation runs, errors, integration activity BUT importantly: No PII (Personally Identifiable Information) must be included in these logs.Why do this?Helps NAB detect unusual or suspicious activity Helps with security audits Ensures compliance with NAB’s internal security policies Allows NAB to troubleshoot issues quickly

I keep getting a “Forbidden resource” pop-up when opening Fusion scenarios recently: Is anyone else getting this?  I can still run/edit the scenarios, but I can no longer access the Incomplete Executions tab.  Last week I got an email about an incomplete execution; the scenario in question runs once daily, so I was able to able to go into the History tab and look at the most recent entry to find the issue.  My concern is with scenarios that have instant triggers--if any runs have an incomplete execution, it may be harder to identify them using just the History tab (some scenarios have hundreds of executions per day).I wanted to check if anyone else has seen this behavior in their Fusion instance.

Hi All,I keep getting a 404 error when testing out the Box make an api call module. I’m trying to copy a folder currently in box, into another folder in BOX.  Here’s what I have:URL: folders/(folder id)/copyMethod: PostHeaders:Content-Typeapplication/jsonQuery String:{   "name": "Project Test Copy",   "id": "(new parent folder id)"} Can anyone see where I’m making errors here?  

Hi everyone, I have a scenario that attaches a couple of custom forms to an issue. It was working fine cca 4 hours ago, but all of the sudden I start getting the following error:The operation failed with an error. [422] APIModel V22_0 action assignCategory does not support argument named alreadyAttachedThe original module being used is Misc Action, with the following setup  And I also tried using a Custom API Call as such   Both modules give me the same error message. I’m really at a loss here, especially since this was working today without issues.Any ideas what can be the issue or how I can fix this? Thank you

Hello,Is it possible to create dynamic templates that can be used when creating a project from either a template or a request?For example:When creating a new project and selecting a template, can related sub-templates be displayed under the main template for selection?If that is not possible, is there an alternative approach where, after selecting a template, certain fields on the project creation page can be used to dynamically adjust values—such as applying a different template configuration or modifying custom fields based on those inputs?