Adobe Experience Manager

Hi Team, I’m facing an issue with an AEM as a Cloud Service editable template.The template contains:Header XFBreadcrumbLayout ContainerFooter XF All components are intended to remain editable. The template initially had a different ordering between Structure and Initial Content. After reordering the components and changing the lock/unlock state of the Layout Container, the Template Editor now shows the expected order:Header XFBreadcrumbLayout ContainerFooter XF However, some existing pages created from the template still display:Header XFLayout ContainerFooter XFBreadcrumb Interestingly, the existing page can show the correct JCR child-node order in CRX/DE, while the Page Editor still displays Breadcrumb below the Footer.Has anyone encountered similar behavior with editable templates, Structure vs Initial Content, Layout Containers, or Allowed Components?Could locking/unlocking a Layout Container or changes to its allowed components cause existing pages to retain an older component/con

I am working with a local AEM as a Cloud Service SDK environment and would like to enable HTTPS access for the local author/publish instance.Currently, the instance is running on the default HTTP port (e.g., http://localhost:4502). I would like to understand the recommended approach for running the local Cloud SDK on HTTPS

Es un mundo lleno de comunidades digitales. Exploraré esta de Adobe con el objetivo de mejorar mis habilidades como Tecnólogo y Business Aministrator.

Hi, I am interested to apply for AD0-E134 Adobe Experience Manager Sites Developer Expert certification exam. and I want to take practice test in  Adobe Certification Exam Prep Portal before attempting my Certification exam. But there is no practice test available for AD0-E134 Adobe Experience Manager Sites Developer Expert. Could you please help us by providing the practice test questions for AD0-E134 Adobe Experience Manager Sites Developer Expert and some reference study materials to prepare for exam.Thanks & Regards:Dharmavaram Murali.Email : dharmavarammurali2103@gmail.com 

Hi ,I am working on a requirement where a custom sling model needs to exclude pages that are unpublished/hidden from navigation, while recursively walking a page tree vis listchildren(). The issue driving this: page that are hidden in nav, unpublished and have a redirect configured still showing up in the list. so we need to explicitly hide unpublished pages, not just hidden ones. To fix this, I check cq:lastReplicationAction/cq:lastReplicationAction_Publish  on each pages’s ValueMap to filter unpublished ones. Resource contentResource = childPage.getContentResource();            if (contentResource != null) {                ValueMap properties = contentResource.getValueMap();                isHidden = properties.get("hideInNav", false);                isPublished = properties.get("cq:lastReplicationAction", String.class);                 isPublishedDispatcher = properties.get("cq:lastReplicationAction_Publish", String.class);            }            if (isHidden ||                 (St

Hi All,I’m trying to add custom styles to the table plugin in an RTE. Below is the structure I’ve used: <table jcr:primaryType="nt:unstructured" features="*"> <tableStyles jcr:primaryType="cq:WidgetCollection"> <style-one jcr:primaryType="nt:unstructured" cssName="table-bordered" text="Bordered Table"/> <style-two jcr:primaryType="nt:unstructured" cssName="table-striped" text="Striped Table"/> </tableStyles></table>But I don’t see the style options in the table edit options. Has anyone implemented similar functionality and can guide here?

We're building a hybrid implementation where a handful of pages (e.g., Home, Contact Us) are served via Edge Delivery Services (EDS), while the remainder of the site continues to run on AEM as a Cloud Service (AEMaaCS). Looking for guidance/best practices from the community on the following:1. Splitting traffic between EDS and AEMaaCS via FastlySince AEMaaCS ships with a managed Fastly CDN in front of it, for a hybrid site where only select pages are served from EDS and the rest from AEMaaCS:Should the path-based routing rules (to send specific URLs to EDS vs AEMaaCS origin) be configured in the AEMaaCS Cloud Manager / Fastly  on the AEM side, or should they live in the EDS project's ? Since AEMaaCS Fastly config is managed through Cloud Manager pipelines, is there a supported way to add custom routing rules there ? Any guidance on keeping this maintainable as more pages incrementally migrate to EDS over time?2. Sharing a common header/navigation (XF) between AEMaaCS and EDS pagesOur g

I’m integrating Coveo with AEM 6.5.23, and I want to make sure that my AEM page metadata and cq:tags are properly indexed in Coveo.I can crawl the content using the Coveo web connector, but I’m not sure how to:Expose custom metadata fields (like cq:tags) from AEM to Coveo.Map those fields in the Coveo index.Has anyone set up field mapping for AEM metadata in Coveo? A sample configuration or mapping JSON would be really helpful. Regards,Karishma.

Hi,We are using AEM 6.5 on prem. I would like to know if there is a way to find out the number clicks over a period of time on published assets in the DAM?Thanks.

I’m looking for some guidance on a requirement we are currently working on in an Adobe Edge Delivery Services (EDS) / Universal Editor (Franklin) implementation.RequirementWe need to assign a unique and persistent identifier to every component instance on a page and use that identifier as a tracking attribute for Adobe Analytics.Example:Multiple instances of the same component can exist on a page. The identifier should remain unchanged even if the author reorders, moves, or updates the component. The identifier should ideally persist for the lifetime of that specific component instance.What We Have ExploredWe have evaluated multiple options, including: Generating UUIDs/random IDs in block JavaScript during rendering. Drawback: IDs are regenerated on page refresh and are not persistent. Generating IDs based on page structure, component sequence, or position. Drawback: IDs change when authors reorder or move components. Adding a hidden component-id field to the component model and at

Hi Team,I have an AEM page that includes one or more Experience Fragments, also known as XFs. The page is already published and is accessed through a domain on the AEM Publish environment.I need to display a “Last Modified” date on the main page. This date should be calculated based on the latest published modification date across the main page and all related or referenced content.The requirements are as follows:If the main page is modified and published, the displayed Last Modified date should be the main page’s latest published modification date. If one or more Experience Fragments used on the page are modified and published, while the main page itself is not modified, the displayed date should be the latest published modification date of the Experience Fragment. If both the main page and one or more Experience Fragments are modified and published, the displayed date should be the most recent published modification date among them. If an Experience Fragment used on the page contains

When navigating to Tools > Integrations in the AEM author console (https://author-p552-e2209.adobeaemcloud.com), I consistently get:An error has occurred.You do not have access to this resource.Sorry for the inconvenience.The "Local token" section below the error still renders fine (Get local token / Create new technical account buttons are visible and clickable), but the main Technical Accounts panel above it fails to load with this error.What I've already verified/tried:Confirmed in Adobe Admin Console that i has Developer Access assigned specifically to the correct product: "Adobe Experience Manager as a Cloud Service - " — not just the generic org-level AEMaaCS product. Assigned the "AEM Administrators - author - Program 212 - Environment 209" product profile to this user (previously only had Integrations/Developer profiles on the generic org-level product). Saved the change in Admin Console, confirmed it shows up under the user's assigned products. Fully signed out and back in,

While trying to do regression test experiences created in Production we are not able to test on Adobe Target

🗣 Looking to continue the conversation after Experience Makers The Skill Exchange? The conversation isn't over.At Skill Exchange on August 12, AEM experts ​@ghowell15 and ​@pstolmar will take the stage — Gary with Scaling Content Creation with Product Launch Accelerator and Generative AI and Peter with Scalable Content Workflows for Authoring and Asset Governance. Afterwards, they'll host an open office hour built for one purpose: to keep that dialogue going with you.This is your chance to bring the questions you don't get to ask live, the use case you're still working through, or the challenge you hit the moment you tried applying what you learned. Come with your real-world scenarios — Gary and Peter will be here to work through them live.What you'll walk away withDirect answers from two AEM experts on scaling content creation with generative AI and building governed, scalable authoring workflows — grounded in what they're seeing in real implementations, not just theory Practical nex

🗣 Looking to continue the conversation after Experience Makers The Skill Exchange? The conversation isn't over.At The Skill Exchange on August 12, AEM Champions ​@BrettBirschbach and ​@venkatkrishnat will take the stage — Brett with Leveraging AI in AEM Cloud Service Development and Venkat with Content Authoring Evolution and Best Practices. Afterwards, they'll host an open office hour built for one purpose: to keep that dialogue going with you.This isn't a repeat of their sessions. It's your chance to bring the questions you don't get to ask live, the use case you're still working through, or the challenge you hit the moment you tried applying what you learned. Come with your real-world scenarios — Brett and Venkat will be here to work through them live.What you'll walk away withDirect answers from two AEM Champions on applying AI to AEM Cloud Service development and modernizing content authoring — grounded in what they're seeing in real implementations, not just theory Practical nex

Hello,  We are using AEM 6.5.22 (on premise version). which uses Apache Tika-core and Tika-parsers bundles with versions 1.28.5.Our Infosec team has reported a vulnerability on these versions and suggested to use the versions 3.2.2 and above. As I checked the maven repository : https://mvnrepository.com/artifact/org.apache.tika/tika-core all the versions below 3.2.2 have vulnerability. We cannot directly updated the versions on our side as this is OOTB.Also, when checked with the latest service pack (6.5.25) also doesn’t have latest tika-core. Any thoughts/suggestions would be much appreciated. Regards,Rohit

SSO (SAML) breaks after an in-place upgrade to AEM 6.5.25 (CFP-25) Environment: on-premise AEM Author, upgraded from 6.5.10 to 6.5.25.Immediately after applying CFP-25, every SSO-related decrypt operation fails with:javax.crypto.BadPaddingException: pad block corruptedThis appears to break decryption of the SAML keystore/truststore passwords and replication transport passwords. As a result, SSO fails and the CMS becomes inaccessible, except by disabling SAML authentication and using the manual login route. The master key is stored in the JCR under /etc/key; it was never migrated to the filesystem bundle. The key value itself was not changed during the upgrade. I simply installed the CFP package, waited until it was complete and restarted the instance, as per the instructions.  The workaround that resolved the issue (currently on test environments) was to rewrite the stored /etc/key value from the older obfuscated format to the raw value, so the newer crypto bundle could read it correct

Hi everyone,I’m currently working on setting up an Edge Delivery Services (EDS) site using an Adobe repository and would appreciate some guidance.My goal is to: Set up a new EDS project using the official Adobe repository Configure the required integrations to create and load the website using AEM Sites authoring Create pipelines, deploy the site, and preview content I’ve gone through the documentation, but most of the references are based on using a public GitHub repository. In my case, I’m working with a private repository (Adobe repo).At the moment, I’m facing an issue with site ownership verification. Even after adding the required verification file, the verification is not successful. Currently, my repository only contains this verification file and does not yet include files like fstab.yaml or other standard EDS configuration files.It would be really helpful to understand the correct approach for private repository setups, EDS site creation, especially around ownership verifi

We’re excited to announce the early access launch of our all-new Dynamic Media Video Player – a faster, smarter, and more accessible upgrade to our existing player. Reimagined from the ground up, this next-gen player is built to deliver a premium viewing experience while giving your brand the performance edge it deserves.We’re inviting select customers to join our VIP Early Access Program! What’s New?Blazing Fast PerformanceOur new lightweight player drastically reduces load times, keeping your site snappy and responsive – no matter the connection speed. We have noticed almost 20% reduction in load time and 55-65% reduction in LCP.  .                             Savings of 70% bytes served for player images and 40% for player JS Adaptive Streaming for Seamless PlaybackComes with full adaptive bitrate streaming support through which the player dynamically adjusts video quality based on the viewer’s bandwidth and device capabilities. That means smoother playback, fewer interruptions, and

Hi everyone,I'm looking for guidance on the recommended approach for securely storing OAuth access tokens in AEM as a Cloud Service.We're evaluating different options for storing an access token that is used for outbound API integrations. The approaches we're considering include:In-memory cache: This avoids persistent storage, but since AEM as a Cloud Service runs multiple author/publish pods, each pod maintains its own cache. As a result, a pod without the token may need to perform an additional OAuth token request. JCR storage under /var: Store the encrypted access token under /var with appropriate ACLs and access it only through a dedicated service user.I'd like to understand:Which of these approaches is generally recommended for AEM as a Cloud Service? Are there Adobe-recommended best practices for securely storing and managing OAuth access tokens? Has anyone implemented a different approach that works well in a cloud-native, multi-pod AEM environment?Any guidance, recommendations,

Hi,I have to create a new schema which inherits the default schema and my custom schema means the newly created schema should have tabs from both default and custom one.how can we implement this. I tried granite:include but in schema editor it is not showing fileds and in image properties it is showing.