Thanks a lot for the reply.Error was due to not including s.tl() inside
a script tag. But even after correcting it and putting it inside
componentDidMount, the current URL being passed is always the parent
one. The route changes seem to have no effect. You know if there's a way
to fix that?
Is there any documentation on integration of Adobe Analytics (through
javascript not through Launch / DTM) with reactjs SPA (not react-native
just plain reactjs)? Or any npm module which helps with the same? For
e.g. here's a module which helps with integration of Google Analytics
with react:https://github.com/react-ga/react-gaAnything similar for
Adobe Analytics? I tried including appmeasurement.js and calling s.t()
from within react code but the code wouldn't compile on doing that.
Thanks. There's still nothing about shared sessions there. Found this
link:https://cqdump.wordpress.com/2015/03/02/aem-scaling-patterns-avoid-shared-sessions/
And as pointed out there, it does give the exception related to
concurrent use of a session when I try to use the same session with
multiple threads. In that case, it's supposed to serialize the thread
access but weirdly the time taken with shared sessions and with separate
sessions and multiple threads are very similar. Hmm... @Jörg_Hoh :...
As per this document, when dealing with multiple threads we'd have to
create one session for each thread:
https://cqdump.wordpress.com/2013/11/25/cq-development-anti-pattern-single-session-multiple-threads/
Does this still apply with the latest JackRabbit Oak used in 6.3 and
above?
Is there any documentation on how to develop a commerce connector for an
eCommerce platform where AEM may not have reference implementation?I
mainly want to know how to develop the product importer in terms of the
classes to extend, interfaces to implement and general guidelines on
what the code is supposed to look like?Is this info available anywhere?
Since there are few ootb connectors I would suspect there should be some
standard guidelines which the commerce vendors used to implement the
con...
Thanks again for the reply. "But it is also fine to make changes in
existing tab inside proxy component." - I share this view but the
document I think says otherwise and I was confused as to the reasoning
for the same. Probably I'm misreading the document... 🙂
Are there any guidelines on what kind of data store configuration
(shared between publish instances, shared between author and publish, no
sharing at all) is best for majority of the cases?I've read in a no. of
places that a store shared between author and publish may be the best
choice because of the reduced storage requirements, reduced replication
load, etc.Is that the go to approach used these days?
Are you sure you're the indexes look the same on all your publish
instances?Could you compare the entire oak:index node tree in the
working and non-working instances (by perhaps using infinity.json or by
packaging them up, downloading the package and comparing the xml
contained within)?
Thanks Arun for taking time to answer this.But it's still not clear to
me as to why I should copy over the original dialog tab but not change
it and in its place create a duplicate and make changes to that. The
reason given is of compatibility.. considering we want to make changes
to the dialog tab anyway..what kind of compatibility are we trying to
preserve here?
"We are just needing to be able to add signatures to a secured document
that allows Fill & Sign usage" - is this your requirement?If so, AEM is
not the product for this..at the minimum it'll be overkill for the
requirement you've described. Why not look into something like Adobe
Sign or Docusign which seems to be tailor made for things like this.
https://docs.adobe.com/content/help/en/experience-manager-core-components/using/developing/customizing.html#customizing-dialogs
As per the 'Customizing Dialogs' section of the link above, when trying
to customize core component dialogs, the dialog should be copied over to
the proxy component (up to tab node) but should be hidden using Sling
resource merger. A duplicate dialog should be created where the actual
changes should be made. What is the rationale behind this? As per
documentation, it is...
What's the deal with language copies - Do they do anything other than
create an exact copy of the parent language branch? If instead of using
the language copy option, if I just go to crxde Lite and create a copy
of the language branch and rename the language node to the new ISO code,
do I stand to lose anything vis-a-vis doing the same thing using the
Language Copy option?
Hello, AEM comes with a number of importers for different ecommerce
platforms which lets you sync product / variant data into AEM
repository. Is there any guidelines or best practice in terms of the no.
of products that can be imported? Would importing large sets of product
data have any negative impact on AEM itself? Thanks.
Not entirely sure what your question is - do you want any pages created
or modified under /content/myproj to be automatically replicated? If so,
why not just use a launcher workflow instead of trying to implement an
event handler for it? The launcher can be set on the path
/content/myproj and be associated with the replication workflow for this
(that is if I got your question right)
Write a Sling or JCR event listener for the events you are looking to
capture. The listener class will be called every time the relevant
events are fired. Within the class you can write the events to some node
and keep pinging the node from your standalone java app at regular
intervals to see the captured events. Or else you can call a servlet
hosted in your standalone app from the event listener every time the
event occurs.
Thanks Jorg that link certainly help. In that link you've said that When
looking from the root node in the tree to node on a lower level, always
add more privileges, but do not remove them. Could you expound on the
benefits of following this approach and drawbacks of not doing so?
Dan thanks for the detailed thoughts on this. Just to make sure I've got
this right, the main (or one of the main) change between AEM Managed
Service and Cloud as a Service seems to be auto scaling capabilities?
i.e. in Managed Services the customer has to decide the fixed number of
instances required whereas in cloud service the auto-scaling
capabilities will take care of this? Any more thoughts on exactly how
the scaling is handled? One other question, it seems upgrades will be
pushed as and w...
Are there any good detailed guidelines on how to structure your page
hierarchy? i.e. the page tree structure under /content//.. ?
Usually, at the root level, you have the home page and the different
sections of your site (.e.g if it's an ecomm site you may have books,
electronics, etc..as sections). Under them you'd have sub-sections or
the actual pages. This seems to be the standard hierarchy I've seen in
many AEM implementations. Any thoughts on whether this is adequate or
when it'll be better...
In case of static templates, javascript libraries / clientlibs which
were used across a section of the site or the entire site were usually
added to the page component referenced by static templates. Even things
like components to be added for contexthub were done in page component.
Is there a way to add such global clientlibs or components in case of
editable templates? Or do these now need to be added in headers /
footers used inside editable templates?
Thanks. But can't things like header n footer be implemented with
existing features like iparsys, design dialogs, etc?Are there any
examples where only XFs would be a good feature to use?
Will the blog posts be composed on author instance by content authors?If
yes, then sure you can use CF. You can create a CF model with whatever
fields you require (e.g. title, body,
etc.)https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-Hn3UDJMc98 - tutorial on CF
models.Better idea maybe to just create a component / template with the
required layout and dialog fields to compose the blog posts. Then just
create a new page using that template whenever you want a new blog
post.This is assuming you want an approach...
Hello, I went through lot of the XF documentation and I understand how
to create it, etc. But I'm still not fully sure when and where it'll be
a good idea to use it. Anyone have any examples of XF usage in their
projects or has thoughts on use cases where XF would be a good solution
to use? Thanks for any replies on this.
Hello, In our DTM implemention, we've got many custom Rule Conditions
which contains jQuery / raw javascript code and also few _sattelite
calls. Will this be migrated as is if we migrate to launch using the
"Upgrade to Launch" option? Or will any manual work b required here?
Thanks.
