I mean I could not see the smaller ECID that could be seen in v200.

Thanks @fhusain I tried this approach and surprisingly I could not see any of those id's in the adobe provided dimension for ECID.

HI @igupta, I checked and no other values is being passed in the implementation. How can I identify the bot traffic and get rid of it?

Why are we seeing such small id's? We have used Tealium ES to have this implemented. 

@DouniaPal I agree with @AmanGu8 and @fhusain , there is no such feature yet introduced.

so suppose, if we have 2 markets i.e., Europe and UK and have 8 different brands for Europe and 7 for UK. If we have same workflow, you are suggesting to have one Global report suite and later on divide it using VRS and have different market wise data and again to have more granularity create anothe...

If we have 8 brands and each of them having their different report suites, and now the plan is to consolidate the report suite. What should be the approach in this scenario? and also would it be better to have all the data in one report suite and setting an eVar to distinguish the brand?

while enabling the evar, I am getting this error. What could be the probable reason for it and how can I overcome it?

We don't have ECID available, so we populate fallback_visitorId or visitorId. Now we have to move to MCID and also have to enable timestamps for the hits. How can I achieve it? Do we have any document for it?

We don't have ECID available, so we populate fallback_visitorId or visitorId. Now we have to move to MCID and also have to enable timestamps for the hits. How can I achieve it? Do we have any document for it?