Hi @ashwinka,That is a quite old archetype version you are using there. I tried version 39 just a few days ago and it works fine. Check out this official tutorial: https://experienceleague.adobe.com/en/docs/experience-manager-learn/getting-started-wknd-tutorial-develop/project-archetype/project-setu...

Well, the request is indeed unclear. Please simplify your question @sampath_kumar_g and reduce the amount of code shared. Focus on the important parts where you require advice and guidance. Btw. ChatGPT or GH Copilot are good candidates to help with code refactoring and simplifaction.

Hi @_CL,my thoughts on this:1) You should for sure look to reduce the number of runmodes. The decision if you need an additional environment should not be based on legacy code and legacy ways of working. In case you do have good reasons to add additional DEV environments and the client can afford it...

In addition to what @Anil_Chennapragada said, DM has its own CDN, so the URL should not be *adobeaemcloud.com but *scene7.com, or a custom domain if you have it set up.Here is an example: https://s7g10.scene7.com/is/content/assaabloy/video-streetAlso, you might want to take a look at the DM Video Pl...

Debugging Dispatcher in the Cloud is a nightmare indeed. I would be happy with some debug headers to begin with.

Hi @mudaliar847906,sounds like you will need to create a custom component but you can supertype the dropdown-bar-takeover-v2. That means inheriting all properties from dropdown-bar-takeover-v2 and then you just change what you need. For example add new fields to the authoring dialog. If you haven't ...

Hi @Prashardan,maybe you can share your log configuration? Did you try restarting AEM, this sometimes helps. Have you checked that your bundle/component is active in the console? Good luck,Daniel

Thanks @arunpatidar. I would very much appreciate your POW on this @Jörg_Hoh.

Hi @krishna_chaita2 try the solution from @MukeshYadav_as it is better and simpler to manipulate headers in Dispatcher. Good luck,Daniel

Hi @ashwinka,TBH I have no idea how this is/would work, but having cyclic dependencies is never a good idea. In that case, I would strongly suggest refactoring the code. Good luck,Daniel