Yes, I used it that way. The problem is that the page views are 8% more than the partner name instances(v84) with full page name as dimension or partner name(v84) as dimension. Thanks

Hi everyone,on the pages linked to the partner program  a concern has been raised about the inconsistency of the valorization of the variable v84 Partner Name.The v84 should be valued with the name of the partner to which the page refers but the number of page views is different whether we consider ...

Could it be a cause that we do not collect the visit_start_time_gmt?Also consider that these duplicate id cases are very few compared to the total.

Can you link some documentation about this?Please

Can you link some documentation about this? please

Thank you very much, I just wanted to know if it was theoretically possible and possible reasons. If they allow analysis over tot years in theory there should be no duplicate id. I can't verify ength of the visit and what actions are being taken. 

Thank you very much, I just wanted to know if it was theoretically possible and possible reasons. If they allow analysis over tot years in theory there should be no duplicate id. I can't verify ength of the visit and what actions are being taken.

I would like to verify if the same visit Id can be used for multiple visits?Extracting visit ID for eStore automatic traffic we have seen that the same visit ID (=concatenation of visitor ID and visit num) is present both in 2022 and 2024.Can you please tell me why it is happening.Thanks