Can you try using "true" from keywords in General functions? What I had noticed in the past is that when you type 'true' or 'false', it sends it as a text, whereas a keyword is sent as a boolean. While they both work the same in the regular search module, a webhook might be more sensitive.

Hi there, you can create a new custom form specifically for "PDF Print Summary" and add the required field in the order you like. You can train the users to select just that form when exporting data. For a more elaborate solution, you can use Fusion. Create a template in Word and use it to generate ...

Hello, Are you looking for the duration of the task? That is automatically captured in the "Actual Duration" field in the overview section. 

Don't know of a way to do it at the Proof level, but you can consider adding a custom form to the document the proof is associated with. You can then create a Document Version report for proof owners where they can add the priority value and then use the same column to sort in the approver's report....

It does include proofs where the decision was "Changes Requested", you can exclude that (or any other custom status) by adding:approverDecision=Change approverDecision_Mod=cinotcontains 

If it's a proof approval report, you can filter using "Awaiting Decision" as True:isAwaitingDecision=true isAwaitingDecision_Mod=eq 

If you are using a Proof Approval report, you can use this:valuefield=documentVersion:document:project:name valueformat=HTML If it's a Document Version report:valuefield=document:project:name valueformat=HTML

Double-check if the status was hidden at the system level or the group level. If it is at the system level, make sure it is hidden at the group level too. If done at the group level, make sure the user is assigned to the same home group and the same group is set for the project. Ideally, once the st...

Hi Mariola, Since "Comments" is a text field, the calculation will not work for that. You can try the following:Add a display logic to the comments field and hide it when n/a is selected for riskOr add a validation on the comments field, such that when n/a is it shows an error message to keep the co...

Hello,I am looking for ways to assign a team/group to a proof for approval. Similar to how tasks can be assigned to a team, we wanted to see if it would be feasible to assign a team to a proof and have a team member approve/review the proof. We have created automated proof templates that kinda help,...