Doug - I looked at this a number of times and I like it.    Enough depth for diagnostics and guides needed to drill down when needed.   An element of interest is how forecasts change with time.  i.e.  If I reforecast every week, can I compare (say) my forecast from 6 weeks ago to the one I have toda...

couple things  - yes to your correction.     50% of the scope but 60% of the cost.       And to the schedule element.   That - I believe - would serve.   The objective with either (cost or schedule) is to get a panoramic view to start and have guidance or tools to lead to areas requiring attention. ...

Doug/Jon...   my history would spend the greatest amount of time in the forecast (Ch15) area.   An element I believe is fair is that as the project progresses you can make a few simple comparisons.   Say 50% of time consumed but 60% of time.   Forecast accuracy of course improves as the project is e...

Doug,   Rather than 'reporting' I am very keen on the variable granularity view.   i.e.    Do I see anything at 50,000ft?   How about 30,000ft etc...    That does permit a quick review be it on a portfolio with say 1 million entries vs a single project with say 1000 entries.   Can you apply this to ...

This is exceptional.   The ability to look for outliers from a higher level (the $ 20k vs $ 10k) view allows flexibility in the granularity needed.  As always the desire is to target opportunities to act or make a decision.   Regarding other areas (other than over budget or scope) - are the areas to...