Thanks David,   I appreciate you studying our graphical model. There's a lot to it, we also really like where it's heading, so are currently building out a set of test cases to confirm how it will behave in different situations. For example, Case B shows a simple ONE WEEK SLIP on a five week proje...

  My pleasure @JaimeDa,   Yes; we (AtAppStore) are Workfront's oldest partner, and you'll find more details on each of the links I sent. Others may also have suggestions on "native Workfront (only)" approaches that might suffice for your needs, too.   Regards, Doug

  Hi @JaimeDa,   Since you're not tracking resource hours I suspect our AFA Burn Report with Baselineᐩ solution is likely overkill, so instead invite you to consider either our Budget Vs Actual Quarterly Burn or Budget Vs Actual solutions (depending on whether you prefer a quarterly or an annual rep...

  Hi David,   I am pleased to share the following prototype to convey and contrast the schedule % against the cost % in a future version of our AFA Burn Report and AFA Burn List solutions.   May I invite you (and any others who wish to join in) to study it, ask any questions you may have, and offer ...

  Thank you @NickyAllen,   That's very kind of you, and much appreciated. As I often say, our best ideas come from clients, so I'll gratefully pass along your compliments to Ross Allmark, who approached us with the original concept.   Hoping I now catch you before you scoot for the weekend Down Unde...

  Thanks for confirming (above) David,   We're going to mock up and prototype some ideas around adding a column the AFA Burn Report that will convey and contrast the schedule % against the cost % which (to pique your interest) might include using a Sparkline of some sort.   I'll drop an update with ...

  Hmm...thanks David,   In your example, I'm guessing you meant "50% of the time consumed but 60% of the cost", so with the AFA Burn Report and AFA Burn List being more "numbers" vs "Gantt Chart", I wonder if we could also pull in columns to show the Approved, Forecast, and Actual schedule percentag...

  Nice: I really like your train wreck indicators vs report analogy David -- an important distinction.   Currently, our 13:20 CH21 Data Cutoff (+/-) is a Highlighting feature that shows numeric values (i.e. costs) that are over that Cutoff in red (bad), and those under that Cutoff in green (good). W...

  Thanks Cian,   I'm glad you agree with our decision to name "Scope Creep" so bluntly (as shown at 09:58 CH16). Surely for someone, somewhere, it would be normal to see negatives in those columns, but for many reasons, Scope Creep tends to be the norm.   Just to clarify, the Burn Projection (shown ...

  Thanks David,   Fun fact: the Data Cutoff (+/- Highlighting) you mentioned actually wasn't in the original AFA Burn Report spec. In parallel, we'd just invented something similar for our (soon to be released) Swimlane solution, so ported it in. It turned out very well, though, giving Project Manag...