Hi Jennifer - perhaps find a relevant place to post your comment on the Community to get more visibility of your example....that really does sound like a nightmare! I believe Workfront are considering removing the Resource Manager role (or changing the way it works) to avoid the complications with...

On a related note, it would be great if we could report on the Journal object. A scheduled Journal report might even partially meet Benetta's requirement. e.g. A journal report filtered for specific project/s or task/s which looks for changes to a certain field (date / status / custom).

You can actually bulk-edit the approvers fortunately as a workaround.

Whilst Giselle is one of the users who like some aspects of commit dates, she has hit on the key issues. I.e.: Once set, they don't change - even if the task is re-scheduled. They are very visible and can confuse users into thinking they are looking at when the task is due, when it is not.Then - a...

Just saw that system-wide widescreen is coming in 18.1! Woohoo! https://support.workfront.com/hc/en-us/articles/115003927233#system-wide-widescreen-display

Yes please! We haven't been able to get any useable capacity/demand reporting out of Workfront to-date.

Hi - I've started a post on the Community asking for people's priorities on which screens they want converted to widescreen next. http://community.workfront.com/discussions/community-home/digestviewer/viewthread/?GroupId=151&MessageKey=601e5779-e462-4d41-88ba-f240ee01040f&CommunityKey=aaafaff0-5e4e-...

I'd really love to understand the logic of removing it. Was it really very difficult to maintain? Was it a third party license they didn't want to renew? Does it push some users towards ProofHQ somehow?

And/or, perhaps colour-code them so that you know easily which are standard and which are custom fields.

Well said, Olivia. Still very unhappy about this.....hoping for a reprieve on further consideration.