This appears to be a duplicate of a request already logged - if you're looking at this, please consider upvoting the earlier submission: https://support.workfront.com/hc/en-us/community/posts/115001035314-Don-t-mark-reviewer-with-green-SOC-indicators-if-they-haven-t-actually-reviewed-commented-

This could include a successor stage having multiple predecessors - activate stage C after BOTH stage a and stage b have been completed. I've had a number of requests for 'all stages at once, EXCEPT compliance which is only after every other stage has approved'.

Dear Dwyer, It sounds like what you're asking for is exactly the cross-project predecessor function. The other correspondence was on automatically closing tasks in other projects. You're asking about scheduling the tasks based on tasks in other projects. If I've misunderstood and you are after somet...

Currently in the interface layout you can customise the fields to show (including custom fields) per object type. However, if your project template includes queues for different issue types, they may not share the same custom fields. It would be great if there was another layer to define the fields...

The ability to designate someone a group administrator is a great step forward, but it would be better if you had granularity of the permissions. That is, for each person who is a group administrator they have check box options to allow: Password resetsAccess to recycle bin (undelete items for the...

Currently, you can use @ to notify a user who is a current reviewer/owner of the proof. For people with edit rights to the proof, they should be able to use @ to notify any user with Proof, adding them to the proof if they are not already. The person adding the user should be able to specify the ro...

Some organisations allow users to build a request in stages, saving it as a 'draft' status and coming back to add more information. Telling the users that to save a draft, you select 'submit request' is counter-intuitive. The terminology section of the interface layout templates should allow this b...

In organisations with Workfront + Proof, a document will typically be added to an issue/task within a project and a proof generated from within Workfront. We should be able to display information (especially information in custom forms) from Workfront relating to the project, task and/or issue with ...

Currently, if you have a stage with multiple approvers but have ticked 'only one decision is required', if a user makes a decision the progress and status bar updates as follows: The overall progress for the stage shows a decision has been made (stage is complete)The progress for every member of the...

Sounds like you want the action flag functionality. I believe this is only with the flash viewer at this stage. Release 2018.1 seems to include filtering on action flags, but no mention I can see of adding them. https://support.workfront.com/hc/en-us/articles/115004329388-Using-Actions-on-Comments...