@josejr19 VEC doesn't apply to us because of our iframe structure,
that's why i'm only looking at FEC. So it sounds like FEC + reginal mbox
is the best way to go and disregard the global mbox. Pro: we are able to
inject the html offers into any reginal mbox, it's flexible, scalable
and accurate. con: if we need to launch testing on a new location on a
page, we need to rely on engineering team to wrap that content with new
reginal mbox. so there is a dependence. Do you agree? 🙂
@josejr19 thanks very much! Do you know if global mbox would work with
FEC (form based experience composer)? Im trying to figure out how to
specify the testing location on the page with FEC+Global mbox
implementation. FEC + Local mbox makes more sense to me, but i'm
researching on the FEC + Global option. Very limited resource online as
far as I can tell.
@Robert_Calangiu Hello, repost my previous questions: All my questions
below are for “form based exp composer”: We use form based experience
composer to create Target A/B test. Currently we are using a few regular
mboxes on the page. Can I introduce Target global mbox together with
regular mbox? aka. Is there an issue to mix global mbox and regular
mboxes together? Is global mbox better than regular mbox? I understand
we can use “targetPageParams” to pass additional parameters to global
mbox. In...
@Robert_Calangiu Hello, all my questions below are for “form based exp
composer”: We use form based experience composer to create Target A/B
test. Currently we are using a few regular mboxes on the page. Can I
introduce Target global mbox together with regular mbox? aka. Is there
an issue to mix global mbox and regular mboxes together? If global mbox
better than regular mbox?I understand we can use “targetPageParams” to
pass additional parameters to global mbox. In at.js 2.x, the global mbox
use...
Hi, Our newly developed mobileweb (MW) experience is an Angular based
SPA that will be hosted inside of iFrame on many of our client's sites.
We plan to implement at.js 2.x using Tealium (TMS). Since Target VEC
(visual based exp composer) doesn't support iframe, we are exploring FEC
option (form based exp composer). Below are some FEC topics that we are
running researches on: Do we still need to create multiple reginal mbox
using get/applyoffer function or we can just utilize one global mbox?If
...
Thanks David and Jason. @DavidSonPM Correct, our SPA will reside inside
of iframe on our different client bank sites. and it's our plan to run
target test inside of iframe. That said, Form based composer is the only
option right? and we don't need to utilize "view" in that case?
Thanks David. @DavidSonPM Regarding Question #1, when creating a A/B
test using VEC, the first step is to enter a activity URL. Since we plan
to run our test in many different bank sites, what URL shall I use? FYI.
our application will be hosted inside of iframe by our clients. Will you
follow up with me via email?
@DavidSonPMWe are developing a mobile web SPA for our financial clients
that will be hosted on our client sites via iframe structure. The base
code of the SPA will remain the same across all clients and we plan to
implement at.js 2.x some time next year. I have a few questions: 1) Can
we use Visual Exp Composer (VEC) to create a single A/B testing activity
for all the clients that we plan to run target test? Since our SPA will
be hosted by many different site. If we create a test for each client...
