Seems that way. This kind of behavior has become more common under Adobe. "We made a change to expected behavior, suck it up or put in an Idea to fix it (change it back)." To me, this is a bug, plain and simple: add functionality, never take it away. (Kinda surprised my users haven't complained abou...

We've never seen this before, and we use alot of fonts! What is the source document? Ours are Illustrator or InDesign, but was wondering if yours were MS Office (like Word).

Are they particularly large or complex videos? Did you try different file formats and codecs? The Support folks can apparently see a log of fails and see what caused it, so you might reach out to them. FOR EXAMPLE: We were getting these alot when we launched and they initially gave us some song and ...

I got the impression that "working backwards from Completion Date" is something legacy that they really don't support (or want to). Every time I tried to get details or get some hand-holding, the basic answer was "I wouldn't if I were you." It does seem to really, really, really mean you have to be ...

Be warned: We wanted to work that way as well, but our onboarding specialist strongly advised against it. They advise just manually adjusting dates to make the end date work out (active rather than passive). We tried it anyway, of course, and boy does WF act wierd when working backwards.

I just wish that Workfront:   Was more consistent whether to default to ID or name (hint: name!).At least had a little toggle or UI element to switch from ID to Name so we didn't have to dive into Text Mode every single time.

My suspicion is Adobe slipped in an update that had a bug: either unannounced, or as part of all these "maintenance updates." I noticed Adobe is in the habit of sneaking things in outside the normal release cycle, and also is not as diligent with QA/QC. Lots of "little" bugs like this keep creeping ...

I've been badgering Support since yesterday. They want me to turn-off the "restrict editing to owners and managers" settings as a workaround while they figure it out, but I wasn't keen on that idea. But between myself and some clever users, we figured out a few workarounds: It has to do with Comment...

I need the ability to filter a Task report by the presence of a specific custom form (custom form "Creative Notes" exists on Task).   Is this possible?

Can you elaborate on the issue? Is it that users are not trained or knowledgable enough to convert a Request into a Task on an existing project? My Project Managers (planners) may not like Workfront, and find it confusing at times, but even they are hyper aware that a request must be converted to a ...