Response on 3/15/2013 was that this was being worked on... any progress
or update? I think it's seriously ridiculous that as a customer we have
to contact Adobe support to notify them that our system is latent before
it becomes a priority. For a system/product that tracks metrics its
seems ironic that there isn't any built in monitoring for latency. Now
that I look carefully at the dates on this post, it was started on
3/18/2010. We're now approaching 4 years... let's go Adobe.
This isn't a new idea, Adam Greco also posted this but he mentioned date
specifically but I'd like to include the ability to reverse the order of
all metrics. For example, if I am running the pages report, I'd like to
be able to see the least popular pages. Or if I am running a report on
link tracking for a page, I'd like to be able to see the least popular
links/actions. This might be the long tail of our analytics trail but
there is some valuable information on the least popular/used
I think the Anamoly Dection feature is very cool (still wish you would
bring back Forecasting, but that's another post). The Training Period
needs some functionality to make it more useful. As another user
mentioned, being able to be more granular like excluding weekends or
weekdays would be helpful. More than that though, for organizations that
run their business seasonally, its not helpful to detect an anamoly
between November 2013 and a training period of August-October 2013
because what we w...
I just discovered the forecasting feature in SC and got really excited
and tried to read up and use the feature. I turned on the feature and
then went to see it in reports only to see no results. I contacted Adobe
support to hear the sad news that its currently a known bug and not
working and worse yet that it may be removed completely as a feature.
We've been looking for way to be more proactive with analysis through SC
and when we found this feature we were so hopeful so its disappointing
Yeah, I'm aware of that option but thanks for the tip anyhow. My issue
is not that I use the back button in the browser, my issue is more with
the navigation itself required to move between admin tools and
report/analytics tools. It's just a bery cumbersome interaction.
Once you enter the Admin Tools, let's say to share a dashboard, add a
user, etc, there is no easy way to get back to the Main menu or the
Favorites menu. It's a very frustrating user interaction when you have
to click several times to get back to the most common/used area of the
product. Please make access to these (the two icons: the SC icon and the
Star icon) two menu items available from anywhere in the product. In the
Admin Tools, this will mean pushing down the menu items so that the two
Adobe needs to fix their documentation for SiteCatalyst. The biggest
problem is that its not up to date & therefore not correct. there are so
many references to version 14 with no mention of version 15. This leads
to confusion & quite frankly errors because definitions/usage keeps
changing in SC. I can't tell you how many times I have had to contact
Adobe support just to clarify a definition or usage of something in SC.
Even worse, as an analyst I am either giving faulty analytics or not
I agree that this would be quite helpful. I think there are some obvious
logical reasons why Adobe decided not to include this feature but I
think its more about priority of features than anything else. I think
programmatically its not impossible but likely it wasn't a high priority
for them to include the logic to filter through what calculated metrics
can or cannot be totaled.
I would like to recommend adding the ability to print/list all
classfications for any report suite. Currently, the only way to review
existing classifications is to go through the Report Suite Manager and
review them one by one. IT'd be useful and helpful if we could list all
classifications for a report suite as well as across report suites. This
would hopefully give us the ability to review our labeling/naming
conventions and verify how they are being created across suites.
I think it'd be helpful if there were a way to have versioning of SAINT
classifications. Particularly for imports. It's quite easy to override
what's been imported previously without any record of what has been
done. Versioning or having a history at the very least, would give
administrators at least some idea who/what has been imported and allow
them to better manage the system.