Hello! In addition to the above (in my eyes very relevant) request, I would also make it possible to und visits and mobile visits for calculated metrics to calculate a ration of mobile visits in SiteCatalyst. Thanks,Claudia

Hello! I totally agree with nic. This is confusing for us "experts" in SiteCatalyst already. For a normal user that is very distracting and contributes to the ideas that the tool might not work correctly and as soon as this starts many people stop using it. @Omniture: please stop showing one metric ...

Hello. I like the idea. Although I would not wan to remove the 4 week prior and I always thought to be honest that 52 weeks prior would also compare Monday to Monday and not January 2nd to January 2nd. I would like to have this average feature as addition to the trend lines we have right now. It wou...

Hello thuypham, Why don't you use e.g.. multi suite tagging: one global reportsuite and in addition to that one for each of your markets. If that is not possible for you, why not use a custom variable (prop or evar) to fill in the different markets and get stats for that individually? Best regards,C...

Hello! We are getting more and more requests to have bounces on referrer type and on referring domains. Hence we would need single access and visits on these reports to calculate the bounce rate. Could you please get this possibility for SiteCatalyst? Thanks.Claudia

I to support nic_Philips. It is very confusing indeed and not helpful at all for the use. I guess currently the comments do not fulfill their purpose.

I'm happy that others brought this up, too! We have the same, espacially in the US. I'm always told to log all slow times or time-outs. Many of them were and are experienced by my users. So it is even more difficult to get the logs. Even if we have some logs we never see any follow up and the issue ...

I agree. Often the referring type report is much more useful especially now that there is this new type "social media". Having other metrics like events on this report would really make a difference in time spent for reporting / analysis. Today I have to select all the domains for a specific referre...

I can only agree to cgg1211. I use Discover a lot for analysis. For the referring type I always need to go back and user SiteCatalyst and often I cannot get the information I need (e.g. segments). So, please enhance Discover with the referring type report. Referring domains is good but really often ...

The Comparison Builder in Discover is limited to a few comparison types:Difference (B-A)% Difference (B-A/A)% Difference Normalized (B-A/A) It would be great if you could add more comparison types or make it possible to add my own comparison types.For me "% Difference (A-B/A)" is much more important...