Hello! In addition to the above (in my eyes very relevant) request, I would also make it possible to und visits and mobile visits for calculated metrics to calculate a ration of mobile visits in SiteCatalyst. Thanks,Claudia

Hello! I totally agree with nic. This is confusing for us "experts" in SiteCatalyst already. For a normal user that is very distracting and contributes to the ideas that the tool might not work correctly and as soon as this starts many people stop using it. @Omniture: please stop showing one metric / dimension and calling it something else!Other example: referring domains in a break down shows types/bookmarked for ALL page views that had "unknown" before. Only a small part of that is types/bookm...

Hello. I like the idea. Although I would not wan to remove the 4 week prior and I always thought to be honest that 52 weeks prior would also compare Monday to Monday and not January 2nd to January 2nd. I would like to have this average feature as addition to the trend lines we have right now. It would be great to have a feature where you could set the time period of which you would like to have the average from. This can be different in many businesses. Often it depends on campaigns. So it would...

Hello thuypham, Why don't you use e.g.. multi suite tagging: one global reportsuite and in addition to that one for each of your markets. If that is not possible for you, why not use a custom variable (prop or evar) to fill in the different markets and get stats for that individually? Best regards,Claudia

I to support nic_Philips. It is very confusing indeed and not helpful at all for the use. I guess currently the comments do not fulfill their purpose.

I'm happy that others brought this up, too! We have the same, espacially in the US. I'm always told to log all slow times or time-outs. Many of them were and are experienced by my users. So it is even more difficult to get the logs. Even if we have some logs we never see any follow up and the issue still exists. Sometimes we get explanations that it is because of big reports but at other times these reports are still loading sufficiently. I can confirm that most of the issues happen when the US ...

I agree. Often the referring type report is much more useful especially now that there is this new type "social media". Having other metrics like events on this report would really make a difference in time spent for reporting / analysis. Today I have to select all the domains for a specific referrer type manually and add up the events in excel. Would be great if you could implement that. Thanks.

I can only agree to cgg1211. I use Discover a lot for analysis. For the referring type I always need to go back and user SiteCatalyst and often I cannot get the information I need (e.g. segments). So, please enhance Discover with the referring type report. Referring domains is good but really often too detailed. Thanks!