Hello! In addition to the above (in my eyes very relevant) request, I
would also make it possible to und visits and mobile visits for
calculated metrics to calculate a ration of mobile visits in
SiteCatalyst. Thanks,Claudia
Hello! I totally agree with nic. This is confusing for us "experts" in
SiteCatalyst already. For a normal user that is very distracting and
contributes to the ideas that the tool might not work correctly and as
soon as this starts many people stop using it. @Omniture: please stop
showing one metric / dimension and calling it something else!Other
example: referring domains in a break down shows types/bookmarked for
ALL page views that had "unknown" before. Only a small part of that is
types/bookm...
Hello. I like the idea. Although I would not wan to remove the 4 week
prior and I always thought to be honest that 52 weeks prior would also
compare Monday to Monday and not January 2nd to January 2nd. I would
like to have this average feature as addition to the trend lines we have
right now. It would be great to have a feature where you could set the
time period of which you would like to have the average from. This can
be different in many businesses. Often it depends on campaigns. So it
would...
Hello thuypham, Why don't you use e.g.. multi suite tagging: one global
reportsuite and in addition to that one for each of your markets. If
that is not possible for you, why not use a custom variable (prop or
evar) to fill in the different markets and get stats for that
individually? Best regards,Claudia
Hello! We are getting more and more requests to have bounces on referrer
type and on referring domains. Hence we would need single access and
visits on these reports to calculate the bounce rate. Could you please
get this possibility for SiteCatalyst? Thanks.Claudia
I'm happy that others brought this up, too! We have the same, espacially
in the US. I'm always told to log all slow times or time-outs. Many of
them were and are experienced by my users. So it is even more difficult
to get the logs. Even if we have some logs we never see any follow up
and the issue still exists. Sometimes we get explanations that it is
because of big reports but at other times these reports are still
loading sufficiently. I can confirm that most of the issues happen when
the US ...
I agree. Often the referring type report is much more useful especially
now that there is this new type "social media". Having other metrics
like events on this report would really make a difference in time spent
for reporting / analysis. Today I have to select all the domains for a
specific referrer type manually and add up the events in excel. Would be
great if you could implement that. Thanks.
I can only agree to cgg1211. I use Discover a lot for analysis. For the
referring type I always need to go back and user SiteCatalyst and often
I cannot get the information I need (e.g. segments). So, please enhance
Discover with the referring type report. Referring domains is good but
really often too detailed. Thanks!
The Comparison Builder in Discover is limited to a few comparison
types:Difference (B-A)% Difference (B-A/A)% Difference Normalized
(B-A/A) It would be great if you could add more comparison types or make
it possible to add my own comparison types.For me "% Difference (A-B/A)"
is much more important for me than "% Difference (B-A/A)".
Thanks!Claudia
Compliment to the new dashboards in v14.7!I miss one very important
option for me and my users. At least 80% of the dashboards are usually
downloaded and sent in excel format. PDF is only used for a small
percentage. I would really appreciate if you could add this option, too.
Thanks,Claudia
In one of the old SiteCatalyst versions we could view 'Referring
Domains' for 'Search Engines' and 'Referring Domains' for 'Other
Websites' separately. I'd like to get this functionality back for the
current version. (Without additional correlation - in the old
SiteCatalyst version I also did not need an extra correlation for that.)
This would be very helpful. My users (of SiteCatalyst) are always asking
for that and it is not logical in a Marketeer's mind to work with
"searches". We calculate most ratios based on Visits. Currently I do
some calculations to come to a number that is close to visits but that
is complicated and cannot be done in SiteCatalyst, hence iit s not very
handy for other users, especially not for the "normal" (not power)
users.
meant to comment, not to promote.This is on one hand a good idea and
would be very useful. On the other hand there might be reportlets that
should be for a different date range then the rest. For example: the
first reportlet is showing the total year to date, all others are
showing last months only.The mentioned functionality would be great but
only if we could fix certain reportlet date ranges like this can be done
for publishing list (prevent from overwriting).
That would be great. The Bookmarks (Overview) has at least a column for
"Owner". For Dashboards its not that easy to see who the owner is. This
would help when you are looking for a dashboard from one specific
account. Sorting by the owner would be even better. Folders would also
be good!
A kind of dashboard template or bookmark template would be great.
Purpose: Instead of creating one dashboard (or bookmark) 10 times for
different reportsuites but with the same reportlets and filters, I could
create a dashboard or bookmark temmplate only once and select the
reportsuite to fill in the data dynamically. This is similar to the
publishing lists but they only work when you send out a dashboard, not
when you use the dashboard in SiteCatalyst. It would save a lot of time.
I would love to have a "Returning Visits Ratio" report similar to the
Returning Visits Report. So far I could not find a why to create my own
(or better company wide) calculated metrics with [returning visits /
visits].
I would love to have calendar events that could be used for a specific
reportsuite (one or multiple) and could be either private (user account
specific) or global (for all user accounts). Global could only be set by
the admin. Private by every user account.
