This post is rather old, but it should still be relevant to your question: http://analyticsdemystified.com/general/tracking-product-returns/Adam Greco

While somewhat extreme, what you can do is to save the main Responsys eVar report and the classifications you do want as custom reports, add them to the menu using the menu customizer tool and then HIDE the original Responsys report.  That will hide the main report and all of its classifications, bu...

To do this, go to the pages report and click alerts, make the metric page views and then use the "select specific items" area to pick the page you want and then set the alert for under 10.

You can capture IP Addresses in an sProp and classify the internal ones and make a Virtual Report Suite off of the classification.  That Virtual Report Suite woudl only have hits/visits for your internal IP Addresses and the cost is $0,

There is a way to pass the time between success events to an eVar using the TimeToComplete Plug-in described here: https://blogs.adobe.com/digitalmarketing/analytics/plug-ins-inside-omniture-sitecatalyst/

There is a checkbox you need to check in the Admin Console under General settings to see GeoLocation reports...Adam Greco

You should set an additional custom sProp and put in a site value that is the same for each page within that site (Unique A or Unique B in your example).  Then if you enable pathing, you will see time spent and other metrics for the site as a whole...

This used to be possible using the ASI feature.  You should ask Adobe if there is a way to still use that feature.  If so, it would look like a new report suite to your users...

For the most part, goals will convert to Success Events, but the two tools are pretty different in how they are implemented.  You may want to check out my book on Adobe Analytics (http://bit.ly/sitecatalyst-handbook) before going to far with your implementation.

You should be able to tweak this in the general settings of each report suite.  I think Adobe recently changed all report suites to have Conversion Level access, which may be why you are seeing this for the first time...You can learn more about that in the latest release notes...