Your achievements

Level 1

0% to

Level 2

Tip /
Sign in

Sign in to Community

to gain points, level up, and earn exciting badges like the new
Bedrock Mission!

Learn more

View all

Sign in to view all badges

AndreyPo
AndreyPo
Offline
  • 22-08-2019
    It would be great if the new type ahead custom fields also supported other major record types such as projects, tasks, and issues (in addition to users). This would grant the ability to effectively create a clickable link from record to another thus enhancing the user experience. Also, this would he...

    Type

    Ideas

    Views

    14

    Likes

    11

    Replies

    1
    API
  • 31-07-2019
    I just spent 3 hours manually migrating hours logged by 11 people over the course of 1 month from one project to another... I feel braindead. The reason it took extra-long was because Workfront tracks the hours to the owner, as such each time a system admin (or a user with the right permissions) has...

    Type

    Ideas

    Views

    56

    Likes

    0

    Replies

    0
  • 19-07-2019
    Fantastic suggestion! One small issue is that teams are cross-company and cross-group, meaning that group admins technically have no business managing teams. I'd like to suggest a small adjustment to this - if the team owner (creator) is also a member of one of group admin's managed groups, then tha...

    Type

    Ideas

    Views

    20

    Likes

    0

    Replies

    0
  • 03-07-2019
    This feature would be extremely useful; currently the fact that the "Deliver this report with the Access Rights of:" field is required is crippling our ability to disseminate "personalized" reports (with filter criteria that includes user wildcards) and no reasonable workarounds are possible.

    Type

    Ideas

    Views

    48

    Likes

    0

    Replies

    0
  • 14-06-2019
    Vazgen, I'm less concerned about this particular change (since it's rather small) but more concerned with the general direction of updates being pushed into production without much notice as of late. In retrospect, perhaps it would have been more appropriate not to roll out this feature into product...

    Type

    Questions

    Views

    56

    Likes

    0

    Replies

    0
  • 02-05-2019
    Would be super-useful! In general it would be even better if we could have a filter for an export of each record type (not just projects) so that it would be easier to make bulk-updates of specific record sets during an import.

    Type

    Ideas

    Views

    13

    Likes

    0

    Replies

    0
  • 13-03-2019
    Upvoted! Although this is probably a pipe dream 😄

    Type

    Ideas

    Views

    89

    Likes

    0

    Replies

    0
  • 13-03-2019
    Agreed! WF API doc needs a new look and functionality, my particular complaint is when an object exists independently of a parent record yet there's no way to fetch it with an API call... madness 😄 It should be crystal-clear to any semi-technical admin working with exporting or importing data via R...

    Type

    Ideas

    Views

    53

    Likes

    0

    Replies

    0
  • 13-03-2019
    Yes please. It was super-easy to do in JIRA, why not in WF?

    Type

    Ideas

    Views

    99

    Likes

    0

    Replies

    0
  • 13-03-2019
    Upvoted! If form isn't completely blank carry it over to the resolving object. Better yet, custom forms should be made agnostic to a record.. just like custom fields are agnostic to forms. Why have multiple copies of the same darn form for main objects when you can just have one.

    Type

    Ideas

    Views

    78

    Likes

    0

    Replies

    0
Top badges earned by AndreyPo
Customize the badges you want to showcase on your profile