Hi Kelly,You can for example create filter like this but you need to specify the Reviewer's name.

This is the button I was referred to. This workaround will not work for reviewer licence unfortunately. Other workaround (but not for everyone) is to give users review and approve role on proofs. In this case they will see list of the proofs to review in the proof approval report.

Hi Kelly,I can't provide any precise ETA at this moment. We plan to release an Alpha version of the new integration in the middle of the next year. As a Workaround Workers and Planners can use our Proofing Manager to check proofs to review. They can just click this button https://www.screencast.com/...

In the 20.3 release we introduced an improvement so that when you reply to a proof comment in the document update stream, we actually take you directly to that comment in the proof viewer. The idea is that we want you to maintain your comment discussions in the original location where they were crea...

Hi Tammy,Are you able to confirm if it still happens when you open document details? Or maybe open a proof. You should not see this behaviour when you open the details but when a user not added to the proof opens the proof is added to the stage with configured permission https://www.screencast.com/t...

Hi Tracy, The change was done on Production today. Can you please confirm that users are not added anymore when you open document details?

This sounds like a defect. Please reach out to our support team so they can investigate that

For this year's Leap my session was about automation of content review process. I hope the session was valuable for you(if you haven't had a chance to watch it yet - you can watch it here.) I'm ready today to answer any questions you might have about the content.

We are currently working on changing the system so that it does not add a user to a workflow when opening up the document details page but only when they open the proof. This change will be introduced next 3 Sept at which point your system will be updated. Apologies for any inconvenience caused to y...

Hi Janelle,Yes this information along with other proofing capabilities are planned. Our UX team was running usability tests for this particular feature. If you would be interested to see our plan and provide feedback just let me know