From a security point of view, it needs to be really clear within the tool who is approving/progressing a library through each of the following steps:
- Summit for approval
- Approved for publishing
- Publishing
At the moment it is really opaque; Although there is an audit log it's next to impossible to decipher. Also I would expect this information to be available within the area where you are viewing a particularly library which it is not currently (there is an 'activity log' but this just shows the date when a 'build' occurs and contains no user info)