MSM and master blueprint
Hi,
could you please help me understanding pros & cons of the two below content structures?
The first one has the head-office site itself as master blueprint, the second one has a separate master subtree.
/content
|- head-office-Berlin (act as master blueprint)
|- branch-Hamburg (live copy from head-office-Berlin)
|- branch-Stuttgart (live copy from head-office-Berlin)
|- branch-Munich (live copy from head-office-Berlin)
|- branch-Frankfurt (live copy from head-office-Berlin)
Vs.
/content
|- master (blueprint)
|- head-office-Berlin (live copy from master)
|- branch-Hamburg (live copy from master)
|- branch-Stuttgart (live copy from master)
|- branch-Munich (live copy from master)
|- branch-Frankfurt (live copy from master)
The main advantage for the first one, as I can understand, is: less steps needed to add a page to the head office and rollout.
The main advantage for the second one is: I always have a one click way to create a new branch.
Thanks!