Esta conversa foi bloqueada devido à inatividade. Crie uma nova publicação.
Nível 1
Nível 2
Faça login na Comunidade
Faça logon para exibir todas as medalhas
Esta conversa foi bloqueada devido à inatividade. Crie uma nova publicação.
Hello All,
We are migrating from AEM 6.0 to AEM 6.3.2.2(SP2 + CFPS 1 and 2). All our application related tags are present under /etc/tags/xyzApp
After migration, when we open any of our components dialog, they are taking long time (around 10~15 seconds) to open.
When we tail error.log, while opening dialog, we are seeing below warnings in error.log
07.2018 06:28:25.803 *WARN* [10.246.75.239 [1532082503111] GET /mnt/override/apps/xyzApp/components/content/site/abc-pqr/_cq_dialog.html/content/xyz/dfh/jcr:content/rhs/abc-pqr HTTP/1.1] org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.spi.query.Cursors$TraversingCursor Traversed 14000 nodes with filter Filter(query=select [jcr:path], [jcr:score], * from [cq:Tag] as a where isdescendantnode(a, '/etc/tags/xyzApp') /* xpath: /jcr:root/etc/tags/xyzApp//element(*, cq:Tag) */, path=/etc/tags/xyzApp//*); consider creating an index or changing the query
20.07.2018 06:28:25.962 *WARN* [10.246.75.239 [1532082503111] GET /mnt/override/apps/xyzApp/components/content/site/abc-pqr/_cq_dialog.html/content/xyz/dfh/jcr:content/rhs/abc-pqr HTTP/1.1] org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.spi.query.Cursors$TraversingCursor Traversed 15000 nodes with filter Filter(query=select [jcr:path], [jcr:score], * from [cq:Tag] as a where isdescendantnode(a, '/etc/tags/xyzApp') /* xpath: /jcr:root/etc/tags/xyzApp//element(*, cq:Tag) */, path=/etc/tags/xyzApp//*); consider creating an index or changing the query
Please let us know how to solve this problem. We have not seen this issue in AEM 6.0
Regards
Sreeni
Solucionado! Ir para a Solução.
Visualizações
respostas
Total de curtidas
These warnings may be stemming from bad index definition, where the "propertyNames" property has type String but the expected type is Name[] and that index is used to index "lastUnpacked" property.
This seems to be an upgrade issue. You may require a hotfix. I recommend opening a support ticket.
Visualizações
respostas
Total de curtidas
Thanks Scott for your quick reply!
We also tried creating an index on query shown in above WARNING message as follows.
Query:-
select [jcr:path], [jcr:score], * from [cq:Tag] as a where isdescendantnode(a, '/etc/tags/xyzApp')
Index:-
{
"compatVersion": 2,
"async": "async",
"jcr:primaryType": "oak:QueryIndexDefinition",
"evaluatePathRestrictions": true,
"type": "lucene",
"indexRules": {
"jcr:primaryType": "nt:unstructured",
"cq:Tag": {
"jcr:primaryType": "nt:unstructured",
"properties": {
"jcr:primaryType": "nt:unstructured",
"primaryType": {
"name": "jcr:primaryType",
"propertyIndex": true,
"jcr:primaryType": "nt:unstructured"
}
}
}
}
}
After creating the above index, we are not seeing the WARNING message in error log, but no performance improvement.
But we are seeing below new WARNING messages while opening the dialog of the component. Please suggest how to resolve this issue
22.07.2018 08:56:34.667 *WARN* [10.246.75.239 [1532264175651] GET /mnt/override/apps/xyzApp/components/content/site/abc-pqr/_cq_dialog.html/content/xyz/dfh /jcr:content/rhs/abc-pqr HTTP/1.1] org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.plugins.index.property.PropertyIndexLookup Expected 'NAMES' as type of property 'propertyNames' but found 'STRING'. Node - '{ jcr:primaryType = oak:QueryIndexDefinition, propertyNames = lastUnpacked, type = property, reindex = false, reindexCount = 1, :index = { ... } }'
22.07.2018 08:56:34.668 *WARN* [10.246.75.239 [1532264175651] GET /mnt/override/apps/xyzApp/components/content/site/abc-pqr/_cq_dialog.html/content/xyz/dfh /jcr:content/rhs/abc-pqr HTTP/1.1] org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.plugins.index.property.PropertyIndexLookup Expected 'NAMES' as type of property 'propertyNames' but found 'STRING'. Node - '{ jcr:primaryType = oak:QueryIndexDefinition, propertyNames = lastUnpacked, type = property, reindex = false, reindexCount = 1, :index = { ... } }'
Thanks in advance!
Visualizações
respostas
Total de curtidas
These warnings may be stemming from bad index definition, where the "propertyNames" property has type String but the expected type is Name[] and that index is used to index "lastUnpacked" property.
Any help here please, i am still blocked on this issue!
Visualizações
respostas
Total de curtidas
I have asked our cust care team to look here. This may be a known issue when upgrading.
Visualizações
respostas
Total de curtidas
It looks like the custom index was not created properly.
Based on a traverse query WARN message you have to have something similar to:
Keep in mind that in AEM 6.3 and 6.4 "jcr:primaryType" property is indexed by default. If you are using one of those versions you can try to reindex /oak:index/cqTagLucene
Visualizações
respostas
Total de curtidas
Thanks Leo for responding!
Visualizações
respostas
Total de curtidas
Thanks Scott and Leo for responding to it.
As suggested, primaryType is created under /oak:index/cqTagLucene/indexRules/cq:Tag/properties and reindexed /oak:index/cqTagLucene.
After re indexing successful, when i try to open any dialog, now i am not seeing any WARN messages in log, but still it is taking time to load.
Below are 2 observations, which may help to give more insights to problem
1. The OOB foundation component(like text, image etc) dialogs are opening quite fast, only my custom components are taking time.
2. We have enabled SAML integration in our environment, if i login with a user(not admin/admin) and try opening a dialog, they open quite fast, but if i login with admin/admin it takes time to load. We disabled SAML and tried with admin/admin user, but still takes long time.
Please suggest.
Visualizações
respostas
Total de curtidas
Any help here please, I am still blocked
Visualizações
respostas
Total de curtidas
Did you follow Leo,s advice exactly as is. I have never seen a situation where dialogs open in the manner you are descring, Is this AEM instance a fresh instance or upgraded one?
Visualizações
respostas
Total de curtidas
Support said:
They need to use chrome dev tool to capture the slowest request....
If he open a support case we would ask for HAR file and if he was able to duplicate the same on an another server
Visualizações
respostas
Total de curtidas
Thank you Scott for your reply!
I followed leo advice exactly, but no luck.
1. The issue is on upgraded instance from 6.0 to 6.3.
2. When we verify the slowest call from chrome developer tools( network tab), it's the call to open dialogue which is taking long time.
Regards
Sreeni
Visualizações
respostas
Total de curtidas
FYI, this is the exact call in network tab of chrome browser taking long time to open dialog
Please help in resolving this issue.
Visualizações
respostas
Total de curtidas
Visualizações
Curtida
respostas
Visualizações
Curtida
respostas
Visualizações
Curtida
respostas
Visualizações
Curtida
respostas