CQ5.3 Renaming a page

Avatar

Avatar
Validate 1
Level 1
jamesa290285
Level 1

Like

1 like

Total Posts

4 posts

Correct reply

0 solutions
Top badges earned
Validate 1
Boost 1
View profile

Avatar
Validate 1
Level 1
jamesa290285
Level 1

Like

1 like

Total Posts

4 posts

Correct reply

0 solutions
Top badges earned
Validate 1
Boost 1
View profile
jamesa290285
Level 1

25-09-2018

Hi,

We are using CQ5.3 and have seen the same issue crop up a few times now when a user renames a page in CQ.

It results in old packages containing the original page, from years ago, being re-activated, therefore activating old content on the site. If the page exists in many packages, all of them are re-activated.

We can see the following event in the logs to indicate this is by design, and the same behaviour does not occur in our AEM6.2 instance so seems restricted to this older version. Has anyone seen this before and can help us with what we can advise the users here please, are they following the wrong process for renaming the page? Or is there some config we are missing to prevent this from happening again?

24.09.2018 15:17:47.454 *INFO* [xx.xx.x.xx [1537798641920] POST /bin/wcmcommand HTTP/1.1] com.day.cq.wcm.core.impl.commands.CopyMoveCommand re-activating moved resource /etc/packages/content/bla/2017/04/pkg_20170410161623429.zip -> /etc/packages/content/bla/2017/04/pkg_20170410161623429.zip

Replies

Avatar

Avatar
Coach
Employee
Jörg_Hoh
Employee

Likes

1,136 likes

Total Posts

3,167 posts

Correct reply

1,080 solutions
Top badges earned
Coach
Give back 600
Ignite 5
Ignite 3
Ignite 1
View profile

Avatar
Coach
Employee
Jörg_Hoh
Employee

Likes

1,136 likes

Total Posts

3,167 posts

Correct reply

1,080 solutions
Top badges earned
Coach
Give back 600
Ignite 5
Ignite 3
Ignite 1
View profile
Jörg_Hoh
Employee

25-09-2018

is this really CQ 5.3? (I ask because you also mention AEM 6.2 ... )

This behavior is rather unusal. And from what I see the name of the resource is the same, I don't see a move/rename. Can you please clarify?

Thanks

Jörg

Avatar

Avatar
Validate 1
Level 1
jamesa290285
Level 1

Like

1 like

Total Posts

4 posts

Correct reply

0 solutions
Top badges earned
Validate 1
Boost 1
View profile

Avatar
Validate 1
Level 1
jamesa290285
Level 1

Like

1 like

Total Posts

4 posts

Correct reply

0 solutions
Top badges earned
Validate 1
Boost 1
View profile
jamesa290285
Level 1

26-09-2018

Yes, it is CQ5.3. I mention AEM6.2 to point out the same does not happen with that version.

We are also aware 5.3 is not supported and is very old.

However, maybe the community is aware of this issue in the dim and distant past and how to workaround it?

Avatar

Avatar
Coach
Employee
Jörg_Hoh
Employee

Likes

1,136 likes

Total Posts

3,167 posts

Correct reply

1,080 solutions
Top badges earned
Coach
Give back 600
Ignite 5
Ignite 3
Ignite 1
View profile

Avatar
Coach
Employee
Jörg_Hoh
Employee

Likes

1,136 likes

Total Posts

3,167 posts

Correct reply

1,080 solutions
Top badges earned
Coach
Give back 600
Ignite 5
Ignite 3
Ignite 1
View profile
Jörg_Hoh
Employee

27-09-2018

well, a lot of things have improved since CQ 5.3... I've seen quite a bit of strange behavior, but I never heard of this. Can you confirm, that the paths in the log message are correct? From me it seems they are both identical.

Jörg