Name of the initiator instead of "workflow-process-service" in "Published by" field

[#1]

Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary:	Hi, I'm writing this because we would like to have the name of the initiator of the Workflow instead of the "workflow-process-service" name in the "Published by" field. Any ideas if we can do that? Or is it a new Feature Request? Thanks Fabio
Use-case:	When publishing pages with the rollout options, it displays "workflow-process-service" in the "Published by" field.
Current/Experienced Behavior:	When publishing pages with the rollout options, it displays "workflow-process-service" in the "Published by" field.
Improved/Expected Behavior:	Instead of the "workflow-process-service" name, we would like to have the name of the initiator of the workflow in the "Published by" field.
Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable):	2024.6.16799.20240614T073455Z
Customer-name/Organization name:	N/A
Screenshot (if applicable):
Code package (if applicable):

[#2]

Hello everyone, any update on this RFE? Is there any estimated-time solution?

Thanks

Fabio

[#3]

Hi everyone, any update on this? 

Is there any way to solicit a resolution by engineering team?

It is important for the business to have this feature restored/developed.

Thanks

Fabio

[#4]

Does this workflow step help you?
https://adobe-consulting-services.github.io/acs-aem-commons/features/workflow-processes/replicated-b...

[#5]

@Fabiodigrazia 

Thanks for proposing this idea.

This has been reported to the engineering under the internal reference SITES-24117. The product team will triage this request to verify feasibility based on the prioritization model. This post will be updated according to the Jira status.

[#6]

Hi @kautuk_sahni,

do you have any updates on SITES-24117 status?

Thanks

Fabio

[#7]

Hello everyone,

any updates on this? There's a way we can check the internal ticket SITES-24117 status?

Thanks

Fabio

[#8]

@Fabiodigrazia I am still waiting for the response on this. But I would also recommend opening a Support ticket with a reference number SITES-24117, they can also escalate this from their end.