SHA256 and SHA512 functions returning wrong hash
Dear,
We would like to hash certain data in our recipients table, but do notice that the returned hash isn't the right one when we use the SHA256 or SHA512 expression. For MD5 the returned result is however the right one.
We've checked the conversion in numerous ways (cf. https://dencode.com/hash --> UTF8, UTF16, ... CRLF, LF, ...) and investigated a lot of deviations (capitals vs regular letter, spaces, ...) already.
Example string: 1ZZ1234
| SHA256 | db33faa6dc66525db69058bd1b0b0a4257aa881218adc83581a2c5bc368be170 |
| SHA256 generated by Adobe Campaign | 5c12c786e84b2b7f8bf4b89e5c88ded8bf6a4fd05908b63050945f9fa5b6322d |
| MD5 | 29e110be8987fd8403f2940a617e668d |
| MD5 generated by Adobe Campaign | 29e110be8987fd8403f2940a617e668d |
| SHA512 | 38c700cd0dbcda40ba1b48605eb2485eca529bc2d2e4c04b21b15539a14098c764bc6f7693a984420dc19cfea8610c9fe485585cfc41dfcc52cc48e3eed71e19 |
| SHA512 generated by Adobe Campaign | e14c06f1c43bb65ee8487f54528a8278bbdd96582b9f23a93901fef04e3f6ed664a85308f56c5360413791bd384c14e2b0adb81b988c6c0fb05cf06530278919 |
We are using the following functions:
- Md5Digest()
- Sha256Digest()
- Sha512Digest()
Does anyone experienced the same or know what might be at the roots of the wrong hash generation by Adobe Campaign?
If you are a campaign user, do you get the same wrong hash?
Kind regards,
Wesley